Domestic Judicial Review of Trade Remedies (eBook, PDF)

Experiences of the Most Active WTO Members
Redaktion: Yilmaz, Muslum

• Format: PDF

Produktbeschreibung

Trade remedies, namely anti-dumping, countervailing measures and safeguards, are one of the most controversial issues in today's global trading environment. When used, such measures effectively close the markets of the importing countries to competition from outside for a certain period of time. Exporters that are faced with such measures can either try to convince their government to bring a case against the government of the importing country in the WTO or to use, themselves, the judicial review mechanism of the importing country. This second path has been, until now, largely unexamined. Domestic Judicial Review of Trade Remedies is the first book of its kind to examine in detail how the judicial review process has functioned and considers the experiences in the domestic courts of the twenty-one WTO members that are the biggest users of trade remedies.

---

Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Cambridge University Press
• Erscheinungstermin: 17. Januar 2013
• Englisch
• ISBN-13: 9781139603744
• Artikelnr.: 52941875

Inhaltsangabe

1. Introduction Müslüm Yilmaz
2. Canada Andrew M. Lanouette and Christopher J. Kent
3. United States John D. McInerney and Michele D. Lynch
4. Mexico Jorge Miranda and Juan Carlos Partida
5. Colombia María Clara Lozano
6. Brazil Rabih Nasser and Luciana B. Costa
7. Argentina Mercedes de Artaza
8. Peru Luis Alberto Leon and María Antonieta Merino
9. The European Union Edwin Vermulst and Juhi Sud
10. Turkey Müslüm Yilmaz
11. Israel Arie Reich and Gill Nadel
12. South Africa Gustav Brink
13. Pakistan Faizullah Khilji and Mazhar Bangash
14. India Madhurendra Nath Jha
15. China Henry Gao
16. The Republic of Korea Jaemin Lee
17. Indonesia Erry Bundjamin
18. Australia Stephen Gageler
19. Countries with insufficient judicial review activity: Japan, Malaysia, New Zealand and Thailand Osamu Umejima, Edmund Sim, Hugh McPhail, Apisith John Sutham, Pattanan Kalawantavanich and Sakkapol Vachatimanont
20. Conclusions Müslüm Yilmaz.