Feminist Judgments (eBook, PDF)

Rewritten Employment Discrimination Opinions
Redaktion: Mcginley, Ann C.

• Format: PDF

Produktbeschreibung

How would feminist perspectives and analytical methods change the interpretation of employment discrimination law? Would the conscious use of feminist perspectives make a difference? This volume shows the difference feminist analysis can make to the interpretation of employment discrimination statutes. This book brings together a group of scholars and lawyers to rewrite fifteen employment discrimination decisions in which a feminist analysis would have changed the outcome or the courts' reasoning. It demonstrates that use of feminist perspectives and methodologies, if adopted by the courts, would have made a significant difference in employment discrimination law, leading to a fairer and more egalitarian workplace, and a more prosperous society.

---

Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Cambridge University Press
• Erscheinungstermin: 15. Oktober 2020
• Englisch
• ISBN-13: 9781108660501
• Artikelnr.: 66181005

Inhaltsangabe

1. Introduction Ann C. McGinley and Nicole Buonocore Porter; 2: Supreme
Court and gender narratives Desert Palace, Inc. v. Costa, 539 U.S. 90
(2003) Commentary: Naomi M. Mann Judgment: Anne Mullins; 3. Pregnancy
discrimination Int'l Union, UAW v. Johnson Controls, 499 U.S. 187 (1991)
Commentary: Wynter Allen Judgment: Marcia McCormick, Young v. United Parcel
Service, Inc., 135 S.Ct. 1338 (2015) Commentary: Bradley Areheart Judgment:
Deborah Widiss; 4. Appearances - intersectional approaches Jespersen v.
Harrah's Operating Co., 444 F.3d 1104 (9th Cir. 2006) (en banc) Commentary:
Roxanna Bell Judgment: Angela Onwuachi-Willig and JoAnne Sweeney, E.E.O.C.
v. Catastrophe Management Solutions, 852 F. 3d 1018 (11th Cir. 2016)
Commentary: Jaspir (Jesse) Bawa Judgment: D. Wendy Greene, Webb v. City of
Philadelphia, 562 F.3d 256 (3d Cir. 2009) Commentary: Sahar Aziz Judgment:
Valorie Vojdik; 5. Harassment because of sex Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v.
Vinson, 477 U.S. 57 (1986) (opinion reproduced from Feminist Judgments)
Commentary: Trina Jones Judgment: Angela Onwuachi-Willig, Oncale v.
Sundowner Services, 523 U.S. 75 (1998) (opinion reproduced from Feminist
Judgments) Commentary: Nancy E. Dowd Judgment: Ann C. McGinley; 6. Sexual
orientation and gender identity discrimination as sex discrimination
Etsitty v. Utah Transit Authority, 502 F.3d 1215 (10th Cir. 2007)
Commentary: Pamela Wilkins Judgment: Catherine Archibald, Hively v. Ivy
Tech Community College, 853 F.3d 339 (7th Cir. 2017) (en banc) Commentary:
Danielle D. Weatherby Judgment: Ryan H. Nelson; 7. Systemic claims and
gender: proving disparate treatment and impact AFSCME v. State of
Washington, 770 F.2d 1401 (9th Cir. 1985) Commentary: Stephanie Bornstein
Judgment: Teresa Godwin Phelps, E.E.O.C. v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 839 F.2d
302 (7th Cir. 1988) Commentary: Maria Ontiveros Judgment: Leticia Saucedo,
Ricci v. DeStefano, 557 U.S. 557 (2009) Commentary: Rebecca K. Lee
Judgment: Marley Weiss, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 564 U.S. 338 (2011)
Commentary: Charles Sullivan Judgment: Tristin Green; 8. Retaliation Clark
County School District v. Breeden, 532 U.S. 268 (2001) Commentary: Rebecca
Hanner White Judgment: Michael Z. Green.