Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Property Opinions (eBook, PDF)

Redaktion: Rodriguez-Dod, Eloisa C.

• Format: PDF

Produktbeschreibung

How could feminist perspectives and methods change the shape of property law? This volume assembles a group of diverse scholars to explore this question by presenting fundamental property law cases rewritten from a feminist perspective. The cases cover a broad range of property law topics, from landlord-tenant rights and obligations, patents, and zoning to publicity rights, land titles, concurrent ownership, and takings. These rewritten opinions and their accompanying commentaries demonstrate how incorporating feminist theories and methods could have made property law more just and equitable for women and marginalized groups. The book also shows how property law is not neutral but is shaped by the society that produces it and the judges who apply it.

---

Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Cambridge University Press
• Erscheinungstermin: 31. Oktober 2021
• Englisch
• ISBN-13: 9781108880022
• Artikelnr.: 66181681

Inhaltsangabe

Part I. Introduction: 1. Introduction to the feminist judgments: Rewritten property opinions project; 2. Property law revolution
devolution
and feminist legal theory; 3. Incorporating feminist perspectives throughout law school curriculum; Part II. Allocation of Rights: 4. Johnson v. M'Intosh
21 U.S. 543 (1823); 5. Botiller v. Dominguez
130 U.S. 238 (1889); 6. Pierson v. Post
3 Cai. R. 175 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1805); Part III. Patents
Publicity Rights
and Trademarks: 7. Association for molecular pathology v. Myriad Genetics
Inc.
569 U.S. 576 (2013); 8. White v. Samsung electronics America
Inc.
971 F.2d 1395 (9th Cir. 1992); Part IV. Condemnation and Adverse Possession: 9. Kelo v. City of New London
Connecticut
545 U.S. 469 (2005); 10. Tate v. water works and sewer board of the City of Oxford
217 So. 3d 906 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016); Part V. Gifts and Future Interests: 11. Gruen v. Gruen
496 N.E.2d 869 (N.Y. 1986); Part VI. Tenancy in Common
Joint Tenancy
and Tenancy by the Entirety: 12. Sawada v. Endo
561 P.2d 1291 (Haw. 1977); 13. Taylor v. Canterbury
92 P.3d 961 (Colo. 2004); 14. Coggan v. Coggan
239 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 1970); Part VII. Exclusionary Zoning: 15. Moore v. City of East Cleveland
Ohio
431 U.S. 494 (1977); Part VIII. Evictions: 16. Phillips neighborhood housing trust v. Brown
564 N.W.2d 573 (Minn. Ct. App. 1997); 17. Blake v. Stradford
725 N.Y.S.2d 189 (Dist. Ct. 2001); Part IX. Landlord-tenant Premises Liability: 18. Bartley v. Sweetser
890 S.W.2d 250 (Ark. 1994); Index.