Science;
- The human and the post-human;
- Language, identity and intertext;
- Holocaust education;
- Publishing, media and representation.
The contributors are drawn from a wide range of disciplines and take varying approaches. They include figures of international renown in the study of Levi (Cicioni, Woolf), and a group of lively young researchers, but also major figures from other related fields, including perhaps Levi's most active British interlocutor and sometime publisher, Rudolf (Rudolf's piece makes some fascinating literary connections from Levi to Leopardi, Byron, and others, but is most interesting as the history of a private correspondence between him and Levi regarding poetry and other matters).
The key strength of the proposal lies in the wide range of disciplines and approaches to Levi's work on offer. The section on Holocaust education is particularly welcome and innovative in academic work on Levi, as is the section on the human and post-human, linking Levi to some of the most interesting and original debates in contemporary philosophy (Hamilton, Benvegnu' look v strong here). Some threads and topics touched on in the other sections are perhaps less original in the field of critial work on Levi, but in more than one case they are revisited with strikiing elegance and clarity Geras is a good example of this here, as he authoritatively draws out lines of contrast between Levi and another survivor-writer, Jean Améry, but in doing so offers powerful insights into ideas of shame and hope from his standpoint as a political theorist. (It is also true, conversely, the Geras speaks as a reader from a related field - poitical theory - and so is not engaging with other work done on Levi and Améry). Other instances of original revisiting of key contributions by Levi would include: Woolf on The Periodic Table, Mooney on the 'Gray Zone'. Some contributions offer original archival research (e.g. Episcopo). Others make bold connections to issues beyond Levi's central concerns (e.g. Noah on Judith Butler's appropriations of Levi on Israel). There is a strong international dimension also, with contributors from Italy, Norway, the US, Australia etc, but also in links of analysis, e.g. between Levi and the Polish context, Levi and Shakespeare etc. The visual dimension of the etchings, which are very fine, would give the volume a distinctive element.
As the proposal indicates, there have been several other edited volumes about Levi published in English in the last ten years (including two by Palgrave in the US). This one would represent a further rich contribution to a growing and popular body of work on Levi. It is perhaps hard to make out a case for it as consistently distinctive from those other very worthy collections, except that it would be longer, more up-to-date and certainly has a cluster of outstanding contributors and contributions. I am also impressed by the care of the presentation of the proposal, the attentive work the editors are already doing with the authors, and the clarity and professionalism of the presentation and the conception, all of which bode very well for the completion of the book and for its careful shaping. Levi remains a highly popular, much read and much studied author, as o
