This book covers statistical consequences of breaches of research integrity such as fabrication and falsification of data, and researcher glitches summarized as questionable research practices. The author explains why data fabrication using statistical models stills falls short of credibility.
Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.
"This excellent book is written by the dean replacing his predecessor Diederik Stapel, who had been unmasked as large scale data fabricator. The title of the book says it all: Klaas Sijtsma didn't waste the good crisis his university was in. The book contains an engaging mixture of the personal story of having to control the damage done by the Stapel case, Sijtsma's encounters with questionable research questions during his career in applied statistics and psychometrics, and a strong plea to improve research quality. That mix works well. I especially like the insightful explanations about why statistics is difficult for most researchers and how easily they're let astray by their intuition. It's also explained clearly why transparency about the research methods used and the data obtained is essential for research to be trustworthy. Taking everything together the book is a convincing plea to engage in open methods and open data, and to involve methodologists and statisticians in research more intensively. Also leaders of research institutes can learn a lot from the book about how to make their organization less vulnerable to research fraud and methodological errors."
- Lex Bouter, Professor Emeritus of Methodology and Integrity, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
- Lex Bouter, Professor Emeritus of Methodology and Integrity, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam