Philosophy and the Sciences of Exercise, Health and Sport (eBook, PDF)

Critical Perspectives on Research Methods
Redaktion: Mcnamee, Mike

• Format: PDF

Produktbeschreibung

This investigation into the rationale and validity of prevailing research methodologies used in sport, exercise and health science calls on researchers to reflect critically on the nature and aims of scientific enquiry in these disciplines.

---

Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Taylor & Francis
• Seitenzahl: 256
• Erscheinungstermin: 1. Juni 2004
• Englisch
• ISBN-13: 9781134421442
• Artikelnr.: 42976542

Autorenporträt

Mike McNamee is Reader in Philosophy at the Centre for Philosophy, Humanities and Law in Health Care at the University of Wales, Swansea, UK. He is also co-editor of the Routledge series Ethics and Sport.

Inhaltsangabe

1. Positivism, Popper and Paradigms: An introductory essay 2. Must
scientists think philosophically about science? 3. Can physiology be
Popperian and Ethical? 4. How does a 'foundational myth' become sacred and
scientific dogma? The case of AV Hill and the 'anaerobiosis controversy'.
5. Why doesn't sports psychology consider Freud? 6. Do statistical methods
replace reasoning in exercise science research? 7. What are the limitations
of experimental and theoretical approaches in sports biomechanics? 8. Can
we trust rehydration research? 9. Is sport and exercise science a man's
game? 10. Autoethnography: Self-indulgence or rigorous methodology? 11. Is
investigative sociology just investigative journalism? 12. Is research with
and on students ethically defensible?
Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and the Metabolic Syndrome: What are the
choices for prevention in the 21st century?

---

1. Positivism, Popper and Paradigms: An introductory essay 2. Must scientists think philosophically about science? 3. Can physiology be Popperian and Ethical? 4. How does a 'foundational myth' become sacred and scientific dogma? The case of AV Hill and the 'anaerobiosis controversy'. 5. Why doesn't sports psychology consider Freud? 6. Do statistical methods replace reasoning in exercise science research? 7. What are the limitations of experimental and theoretical approaches in sports biomechanics? 8. Can we trust rehydration research? 9. Is sport and exercise science a man's game? 10. Autoethnography: Self-indulgence or rigorous methodology? 11. Is investigative sociology just investigative journalism? 12. Is research with and on students ethically defensible?
Obesity, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and the Metabolic Syndrome: What are the choices for prevention in the 21st century?