Sarah Broadie

Plato's Sun-Like Good (eBook, PDF)

Dialectic in the Republic

• Format: PDF

Produktbeschreibung

An original and lucid discussion of the Republic''s philosopher-rulers, their dialectic, and their relationship to the form of the good.

---

Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: Cambridge University Press
• Erscheinungstermin: 22. Juli 2021
• Englisch
• ISBN-13: 9781009036030
• Artikelnr.: 70911976

Autorenporträt

Sarah Broadie is Bishop Wardlaw Professor of Philosophy at the University of St Andrews. She is author of Aristotle and Beyond: Essays on Metaphysics and Ethics (Cambridge University Press, 2007) and Nature and Divinity in Plato's Timaeus (Cambridge University Press, 2011), and editor of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics: A Philosophical Introduction and Commentary (2002). She has published dozens of book chapters and articles on Plato and Aristotle, and was awarded an OBE in 2019 for services to classical philosophy.

Inhaltsangabe

Part 1. Approaching the Sun-Good Analogy: 1.1 Introductory
1.2 The philosopher-rulers' intellectual task
1.3 'The most important thing to learn': Between plural and singular
1.4 What further knowledge does the longer way achieve?
Part 2. The Form of the Good and Knowledge: 2.1 Sun, cave, and sun again
2.2 Connecting sun and line
2.3 Higher and lower intellectual levels
2.4 Mathematical versus dialectical hypotheses
2.5 Saph¿neia
2.6 The form of the good as non-hypothetical principle
2.7 Dialectic and the good: Some questions
2.8 The role of the form of the good in dialectic
2.9 Some objections and replies
2.10 Textual counterevidence
2.11 The non-hypothetical principle as first premiss?
2.12 The form of the good as object of definition?
2.13 Dialectic and experience
2.14 Diagrams, dialectic, and context
2.15 Dialectic in government
2.16 Not rigorous enough?
2.17 Why is dialectic cognitively superior to mathematics?
2.18 Why are we shown so little about dialectic in the Republic?
2.19 True philosophers versus sight-lovers
2.20 Criteria and scope of 'good'
2.21 Main positions of Parts 1 and 2
Part 3. The Form of the Good and Being: 3.1 Preliminaries
3.2 First proposal
3.3 Interim discussion of 505a2-4
3.4 Second proposal
3.5 Perfectionist accounts
3.6 System accounts
Part 4. Various Further Questions: 4.1 Ambiguity of 'the good' (I)
4.2 Ambiguity of 'the good' (II)
4.3 Why the mathematical education?
4.4 Cosmology, theology
Part 5. Winding Up.