1,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
Sofort per Download lieferbar
  • Format: ePub

Professor Royce's Libel, written by Francis Ellingwood Abbot, is a thought-provoking and controversial work that delves into the concept of academic freedom within the context of a university setting. The narrative is crafted with a sharp and incisive literary style, filled with intellectual arguments and philosophical inquiries that challenge societal norms. Abbot's portrayal of the characters and their interactions reflects the complexities of human nature and the power dynamics at play in academic institutions during the late 19th century. Francis Ellingwood Abbot, a prominent American…mehr

Produktbeschreibung
Professor Royce's Libel, written by Francis Ellingwood Abbot, is a thought-provoking and controversial work that delves into the concept of academic freedom within the context of a university setting. The narrative is crafted with a sharp and incisive literary style, filled with intellectual arguments and philosophical inquiries that challenge societal norms. Abbot's portrayal of the characters and their interactions reflects the complexities of human nature and the power dynamics at play in academic institutions during the late 19th century. Francis Ellingwood Abbot, a prominent American philosopher and theologian, was known for his radical views on religion and ethics. His personal experiences with censorship and backlash likely influenced the creation of Professor Royce's Libel, as the book explores themes of intellectual autonomy and the consequences of challenging authority in a restrictive environment. Abbot's background in philosophy brings a depth of insight to the novel, offering readers a unique perspective on the importance of free thought and individual expression. I highly recommend Professor Royce's Libel to readers interested in philosophical debates, academic discourse, and the historical context of intellectual freedom. Abbot's work invites readers to critically examine the dynamics of power and knowledge within educational institutions while raising important questions about the role of dissent and integrity in scholarly pursuits.