In Rethinking Absurdity, Matthew H. Bowker offers a surprising account of absurdity as a widespread endeavor to make parts of our experience meaningless. Drawing upon diverse sources from philosophy, literature, politics, psychoanalysis, theology, and contemporary culture, Bowker identifies the absurd effort to make aspects of our histories, our selves, and our public projects meaningless with postmodern revolts against reason and subjectivity. Rethinking Absurdity will be of interest to scholars and practitioners in the fields of political science, philosophy, literature, psychoanalysis, sociology, and cultural studies
Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.
"A valuable addition to the literature that contests the fashionable celebration of an absurd existence. This is an insightful and important work."
-Stephen Eric Bronner, Rutgers University
"Bowker rescues absurdity from literary and philosophical neglect, showing how it affects the work of diverse authors such as Dylan Thomas, Judith Butler, Giorgio Agamben, and Emmanuel Levinas, not to mention a television show about zombies. Absurdity, he argues, is a protest and defense against the meaningful experience of loss. Especially valuable is Bowker's playing off the literature of absurdity with his own qualitative research on the topic. The book is a dazzling display of erudition by an intellectual who has his feet on the ground, a rare combination of virtues."
-C. Fred Alford, University of Maryland, College Park
"Matthew Bowker has written a welcome exploration and critique of the treatment of subjectivity in contemporary literature. Especially notable is Bowker's treatment of grief and the insistence on the part of some authors that acceptance of loss is neither possible nor desirable. In developing his ideas, Bowker poses and suggests answers to a number of genuinely important questions including whether what he refers to as the "absurd experience" offers freedom from illusion or instead "a regressive and melancholy illusion about the value of perpetual grief whose goal is to incapacitate subjects so that all may share the same absurd fate." This is an engaging book filled with sharp insights into matters of importance. It offers a much needed counterpoint to the celebration of suffering that is so much a part of our intellectual and political landscape."
-David Levine, University of Denver
"Matthew H. Bowker's rigorously researched volume provides a welcome contribution to the ongoing debate surrounding this author and his work. Ultimately, it is the aim of this thoughtfully written work (which includes a full index and bibliography) to 'make absurdity meaningful' through a process of rethinking; by the end, the reader is left in no doubt that such a laudable objective has been achieved.The book can be highly recommended to both the specialist and non-specialist reader, who will doubtless discover that a topic which was thought to have been researched to its limits still has many intellectual surprises in store."
- Mark Orme, University of Central Lancashire, French Studies: A Quarterly Review, Vol 68, #4
"In these two books, Matthew Bowker brings welcome attention to the concept of the absurd, which has largely been neglected in recent political theory and philosophy.
Bowker's treatment of the concept breathes new life into the absurd and makes an interesting contribution to the recent rethinking of Albert Camus's ethical and political thought."
-- Antony Lyon, University of California, San Diego
-Stephen Eric Bronner, Rutgers University
"Bowker rescues absurdity from literary and philosophical neglect, showing how it affects the work of diverse authors such as Dylan Thomas, Judith Butler, Giorgio Agamben, and Emmanuel Levinas, not to mention a television show about zombies. Absurdity, he argues, is a protest and defense against the meaningful experience of loss. Especially valuable is Bowker's playing off the literature of absurdity with his own qualitative research on the topic. The book is a dazzling display of erudition by an intellectual who has his feet on the ground, a rare combination of virtues."
-C. Fred Alford, University of Maryland, College Park
"Matthew Bowker has written a welcome exploration and critique of the treatment of subjectivity in contemporary literature. Especially notable is Bowker's treatment of grief and the insistence on the part of some authors that acceptance of loss is neither possible nor desirable. In developing his ideas, Bowker poses and suggests answers to a number of genuinely important questions including whether what he refers to as the "absurd experience" offers freedom from illusion or instead "a regressive and melancholy illusion about the value of perpetual grief whose goal is to incapacitate subjects so that all may share the same absurd fate." This is an engaging book filled with sharp insights into matters of importance. It offers a much needed counterpoint to the celebration of suffering that is so much a part of our intellectual and political landscape."
-David Levine, University of Denver
"Matthew H. Bowker's rigorously researched volume provides a welcome contribution to the ongoing debate surrounding this author and his work. Ultimately, it is the aim of this thoughtfully written work (which includes a full index and bibliography) to 'make absurdity meaningful' through a process of rethinking; by the end, the reader is left in no doubt that such a laudable objective has been achieved.The book can be highly recommended to both the specialist and non-specialist reader, who will doubtless discover that a topic which was thought to have been researched to its limits still has many intellectual surprises in store."
- Mark Orme, University of Central Lancashire, French Studies: A Quarterly Review, Vol 68, #4
"In these two books, Matthew Bowker brings welcome attention to the concept of the absurd, which has largely been neglected in recent political theory and philosophy.
Bowker's treatment of the concept breathes new life into the absurd and makes an interesting contribution to the recent rethinking of Albert Camus's ethical and political thought."
-- Antony Lyon, University of California, San Diego