Nicht lieferbar
DISCLAIMER
This book does not in any capacity mean to replace the original book but to serve as a vast summary of the original book.
Summary of Reading the Constitution by Stephen Breyer: Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism
IN THIS SUMMARIZED BOOK, YOU WILL GET:
Stephen Breyer, a retired Supreme Court Justice, presents a compelling analysis that challenges the textualist philosophy of the current Supreme Court's supermajority and advocates for a better interpretation of the Constitution. Breyer argues that understanding the purposes of statutes and the consequences of a case is crucial for interpreting law. He examines significant cases in the nation's history, such as the Dobbs and Bruen decisions, which he believes were wrongly decided and have led to harmful results.
This book does not in any capacity mean to replace the original book but to serve as a vast summary of the original book.
Summary of Reading the Constitution by Stephen Breyer: Why I Chose Pragmatism, Not Textualism
IN THIS SUMMARIZED BOOK, YOU WILL GET:
- Chapter provides an astute outline of the main contents.
- Fast & simple understanding of the content analysis.
- Exceptionally summarized content that you may skip in the original book
Stephen Breyer, a retired Supreme Court Justice, presents a compelling analysis that challenges the textualist philosophy of the current Supreme Court's supermajority and advocates for a better interpretation of the Constitution. Breyer argues that understanding the purposes of statutes and the consequences of a case is crucial for interpreting law. He examines significant cases in the nation's history, such as the Dobbs and Bruen decisions, which he believes were wrongly decided and have led to harmful results.