The Affordable Care Act Decision (eBook, ePUB)
Philosophical and Legal Implications
Redaktion: Allhoff, Fritz; Hall, Mark
46,95 €
46,95 €
inkl. MwSt.
Sofort per Download lieferbar
23 °P sammeln
46,95 €
Als Download kaufen
46,95 €
inkl. MwSt.
Sofort per Download lieferbar
23 °P sammeln
Jetzt verschenken
Alle Infos zum eBook verschenken
46,95 €
inkl. MwSt.
Sofort per Download lieferbar
Alle Infos zum eBook verschenken
23 °P sammeln
The Affordable Care Act Decision (eBook, ePUB)
Philosophical and Legal Implications
Redaktion: Allhoff, Fritz; Hall, Mark
- Format: ePub
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
Bitte loggen Sie sich zunächst in Ihr Kundenkonto ein oder registrieren Sie sich bei
bücher.de, um das eBook-Abo tolino select nutzen zu können.
Hier können Sie sich einloggen
Hier können Sie sich einloggen
Sie sind bereits eingeloggt. Klicken Sie auf 2. tolino select Abo, um fortzufahren.
Bitte loggen Sie sich zunächst in Ihr Kundenkonto ein oder registrieren Sie sich bei bücher.de, um das eBook-Abo tolino select nutzen zu können.
This volume analyzes various features of the NFIB v. Sebelius decision regarding the Affordable Care Act with contributions from a range of academic disciplines, namely philosophy, law, and political science. Essays are divided into five parts: context and history, analyzing the opinions, individual liberty, Medicaid, and future implications.
- Geräte: eReader
- mit Kopierschutz
- eBook Hilfe
- Größe: 1.6MB
Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
- The Affordable Care Act Decision (eBook, PDF)46,95 €
- Christos BoukalasBiosecurity, Economic Collapse, the State to Come (eBook, ePUB)42,95 €
- European Drug Policies (eBook, ePUB)46,95 €
- Routledge Handbook of Family Law and Policy (eBook, ePUB)47,95 €
- Restrictive Practices in Health Care and Disability Settings (eBook, ePUB)42,95 €
- Healthcare Ethics, Law and Professionalism (eBook, ePUB)42,95 €
- Jo BridgemanMedical Treatment of Children and the Law (eBook, ePUB)42,95 €
-
-
-
This volume analyzes various features of the NFIB v. Sebelius decision regarding the Affordable Care Act with contributions from a range of academic disciplines, namely philosophy, law, and political science. Essays are divided into five parts: context and history, analyzing the opinions, individual liberty, Medicaid, and future implications.
Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Taylor & Francis
- Seitenzahl: 358
- Erscheinungstermin: 18. Februar 2014
- Englisch
- ISBN-13: 9781134641086
- Artikelnr.: 40515177
- Verlag: Taylor & Francis
- Seitenzahl: 358
- Erscheinungstermin: 18. Februar 2014
- Englisch
- ISBN-13: 9781134641086
- Artikelnr.: 40515177
- Herstellerkennzeichnung Die Herstellerinformationen sind derzeit nicht verfügbar.
Fritz Allhoff is an Associate Professor in the Department of Philosophy at Western Michigan University, USA and a Senior Research Fellow at the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics, Australia. Dr. Allhoff serves on the International Committee of Military Medicine in Switzerland. He is the author or editor of nearly thirty books and his papers have been published in top medical ethics journals, including American Journal of Bioethics, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, and Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. Dr. Allhoff is currently finishing a J.D. at the University of Michigan Law School. Mark A. Hall is the Fred and Elizabeth Turnage Professor of Law and Public Health at Wake Forest University, USA, where he co-directs its Master of Arts in Bioethics program and has appointments in the Schools of Law, Medicine, and Business. He is the lead editor of the original textbook in the field, Health Care Law and Ethics (8th ed., 2013) and he has written books on various aspects of health care law and public policy. Professor Hall is currently studying health insurance reform, safety net access for the uninsured, and the legal and ethical implications of consumer-driven health care.
Introduction Fritz Allhoff and Mark A. Hall Unit 1: Context and History 1.
NFIB v. Sebelius: Five Takes Glenn H. Reynolds and Brannon P. Denning 2.
Popular Constitutionalism and the Affordable Care Act Josh Blackman 3.
Metaphysical Philosophers and the 'Practical Statesmanship' of Supreme
Court Justices in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
Brian E. Butler 4. By Any Means Necessary? The Constitutionalisation of
Healthcare in the United States of America, United Kingdom, and Brazil
Jane Marriot and Jamie Fletcher Unit 2: Analyzing the Opinions 5. Fractured
Group Speech Acts and the Holding of NFIB v. Sebelius Caleb Mason 6. A
Strategy of Increasing Judicial Power in NFIB v. Sebelius Tonja Jacobi 7.
The Health Insurance Mandate Really is a Tax, and That's a Good Thing Too
Paul Gowder 8. Activity, Inactivity, and Production: Roberts' Commerce
Clause Argument Nathan Stout Unit 3: Individual Liberty 9. Autonomy and the
ACA Individual Mandate JB Coleman 10. Employers' Rights and the ACA
Jessica Flanigan 11. Moral Pluralism and Federal Authority Jacob Affolter
12. The ACA and Religious Liberty: Principles of Adjudication R. Mary
Lemmons Unit 4: Medicaid 13. Fiscal Objections to Expanded Health Coverage:
A Case Study of the ACA Alex Rajczi 14. In Defence of the ACA's Medicaid
Expansion Ishani Maitra and Brian Weatherson 15. Coercion, Political
Accountability, and Voter Ignorance: The Mistaken Medicaid Expansion Ruling
in NFIB v. Sebelius Alexander A. Guerrero 16. Was the Medicaid Expansion
Coercive? I. Glenn Cohen Unit 5: Future Implications 17. Conditional
Spending and the Conditional Offer Puzzle Mitchell N. Berman 18. The Health
of the Commerce Clause: The Sebelius Decision and the Future of Federal
Power Marcus Schulzke and Amanda Cortney Carroll 19. Reflections on the
Rule of Law After NFIB v. Sebelius Christopher Boom 20. "The Alien
Exclusion: ACA and the Oblique Rights of Those on the Margins" Jill
Hernandez
NFIB v. Sebelius: Five Takes Glenn H. Reynolds and Brannon P. Denning 2.
Popular Constitutionalism and the Affordable Care Act Josh Blackman 3.
Metaphysical Philosophers and the 'Practical Statesmanship' of Supreme
Court Justices in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
Brian E. Butler 4. By Any Means Necessary? The Constitutionalisation of
Healthcare in the United States of America, United Kingdom, and Brazil
Jane Marriot and Jamie Fletcher Unit 2: Analyzing the Opinions 5. Fractured
Group Speech Acts and the Holding of NFIB v. Sebelius Caleb Mason 6. A
Strategy of Increasing Judicial Power in NFIB v. Sebelius Tonja Jacobi 7.
The Health Insurance Mandate Really is a Tax, and That's a Good Thing Too
Paul Gowder 8. Activity, Inactivity, and Production: Roberts' Commerce
Clause Argument Nathan Stout Unit 3: Individual Liberty 9. Autonomy and the
ACA Individual Mandate JB Coleman 10. Employers' Rights and the ACA
Jessica Flanigan 11. Moral Pluralism and Federal Authority Jacob Affolter
12. The ACA and Religious Liberty: Principles of Adjudication R. Mary
Lemmons Unit 4: Medicaid 13. Fiscal Objections to Expanded Health Coverage:
A Case Study of the ACA Alex Rajczi 14. In Defence of the ACA's Medicaid
Expansion Ishani Maitra and Brian Weatherson 15. Coercion, Political
Accountability, and Voter Ignorance: The Mistaken Medicaid Expansion Ruling
in NFIB v. Sebelius Alexander A. Guerrero 16. Was the Medicaid Expansion
Coercive? I. Glenn Cohen Unit 5: Future Implications 17. Conditional
Spending and the Conditional Offer Puzzle Mitchell N. Berman 18. The Health
of the Commerce Clause: The Sebelius Decision and the Future of Federal
Power Marcus Schulzke and Amanda Cortney Carroll 19. Reflections on the
Rule of Law After NFIB v. Sebelius Christopher Boom 20. "The Alien
Exclusion: ACA and the Oblique Rights of Those on the Margins" Jill
Hernandez
Introduction Fritz Allhoff and Mark A. Hall Unit 1: Context and History 1.
NFIB v. Sebelius: Five Takes Glenn H. Reynolds and Brannon P. Denning 2.
Popular Constitutionalism and the Affordable Care Act Josh Blackman 3.
Metaphysical Philosophers and the 'Practical Statesmanship' of Supreme
Court Justices in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
Brian E. Butler 4. By Any Means Necessary? The Constitutionalisation of
Healthcare in the United States of America, United Kingdom, and Brazil
Jane Marriot and Jamie Fletcher Unit 2: Analyzing the Opinions 5. Fractured
Group Speech Acts and the Holding of NFIB v. Sebelius Caleb Mason 6. A
Strategy of Increasing Judicial Power in NFIB v. Sebelius Tonja Jacobi 7.
The Health Insurance Mandate Really is a Tax, and That's a Good Thing Too
Paul Gowder 8. Activity, Inactivity, and Production: Roberts' Commerce
Clause Argument Nathan Stout Unit 3: Individual Liberty 9. Autonomy and the
ACA Individual Mandate JB Coleman 10. Employers' Rights and the ACA
Jessica Flanigan 11. Moral Pluralism and Federal Authority Jacob Affolter
12. The ACA and Religious Liberty: Principles of Adjudication R. Mary
Lemmons Unit 4: Medicaid 13. Fiscal Objections to Expanded Health Coverage:
A Case Study of the ACA Alex Rajczi 14. In Defence of the ACA's Medicaid
Expansion Ishani Maitra and Brian Weatherson 15. Coercion, Political
Accountability, and Voter Ignorance: The Mistaken Medicaid Expansion Ruling
in NFIB v. Sebelius Alexander A. Guerrero 16. Was the Medicaid Expansion
Coercive? I. Glenn Cohen Unit 5: Future Implications 17. Conditional
Spending and the Conditional Offer Puzzle Mitchell N. Berman 18. The Health
of the Commerce Clause: The Sebelius Decision and the Future of Federal
Power Marcus Schulzke and Amanda Cortney Carroll 19. Reflections on the
Rule of Law After NFIB v. Sebelius Christopher Boom 20. "The Alien
Exclusion: ACA and the Oblique Rights of Those on the Margins" Jill
Hernandez
NFIB v. Sebelius: Five Takes Glenn H. Reynolds and Brannon P. Denning 2.
Popular Constitutionalism and the Affordable Care Act Josh Blackman 3.
Metaphysical Philosophers and the 'Practical Statesmanship' of Supreme
Court Justices in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius
Brian E. Butler 4. By Any Means Necessary? The Constitutionalisation of
Healthcare in the United States of America, United Kingdom, and Brazil
Jane Marriot and Jamie Fletcher Unit 2: Analyzing the Opinions 5. Fractured
Group Speech Acts and the Holding of NFIB v. Sebelius Caleb Mason 6. A
Strategy of Increasing Judicial Power in NFIB v. Sebelius Tonja Jacobi 7.
The Health Insurance Mandate Really is a Tax, and That's a Good Thing Too
Paul Gowder 8. Activity, Inactivity, and Production: Roberts' Commerce
Clause Argument Nathan Stout Unit 3: Individual Liberty 9. Autonomy and the
ACA Individual Mandate JB Coleman 10. Employers' Rights and the ACA
Jessica Flanigan 11. Moral Pluralism and Federal Authority Jacob Affolter
12. The ACA and Religious Liberty: Principles of Adjudication R. Mary
Lemmons Unit 4: Medicaid 13. Fiscal Objections to Expanded Health Coverage:
A Case Study of the ACA Alex Rajczi 14. In Defence of the ACA's Medicaid
Expansion Ishani Maitra and Brian Weatherson 15. Coercion, Political
Accountability, and Voter Ignorance: The Mistaken Medicaid Expansion Ruling
in NFIB v. Sebelius Alexander A. Guerrero 16. Was the Medicaid Expansion
Coercive? I. Glenn Cohen Unit 5: Future Implications 17. Conditional
Spending and the Conditional Offer Puzzle Mitchell N. Berman 18. The Health
of the Commerce Clause: The Sebelius Decision and the Future of Federal
Power Marcus Schulzke and Amanda Cortney Carroll 19. Reflections on the
Rule of Law After NFIB v. Sebelius Christopher Boom 20. "The Alien
Exclusion: ACA and the Oblique Rights of Those on the Margins" Jill
Hernandez