There is a tendency in public debate to downplay the significance of populism by attributing its rise to the inadequacies of those who vote for populist leaders and parties. But this way of thinking prevents us from seeing that the rise of populism may be linked to problems and shortcomings in the way our democracies work.
In this important book, Armin Schäfer and Michael Zürn argue that the rise of authoritarian populism is rooted in two developments that are specifically political in character: first, the unequal responsiveness of parliaments towards less privileged citizens; and second, the growing political role of non-majoritarian institutions, like central banks and international institutions, that remove decisions from public debate and entrust them to experts. Contemporary democracy is increasingly perceived as lacking openness and representativeness. More and more citizens come to feel that politics is made by a closed political class oblivious to the concerns of ordinary people, and those who share this view are more likely to vote for authoritarian populists.
Although contemporary populists keep rubbing salt into the wound of liberal democracy, their responses fail to solve the problems of democratic politics. On the contrary, wherever authoritarian-populist parties have come to power, they have damaged democracy rather than expanding it or reducing existing inequalities.
In this important book, Armin Schäfer and Michael Zürn argue that the rise of authoritarian populism is rooted in two developments that are specifically political in character: first, the unequal responsiveness of parliaments towards less privileged citizens; and second, the growing political role of non-majoritarian institutions, like central banks and international institutions, that remove decisions from public debate and entrust them to experts. Contemporary democracy is increasingly perceived as lacking openness and representativeness. More and more citizens come to feel that politics is made by a closed political class oblivious to the concerns of ordinary people, and those who share this view are more likely to vote for authoritarian populists.
Although contemporary populists keep rubbing salt into the wound of liberal democracy, their responses fail to solve the problems of democratic politics. On the contrary, wherever authoritarian-populist parties have come to power, they have damaged democracy rather than expanding it or reducing existing inequalities.
Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in D ausgeliefert werden.
'The Democratic Regression explains why democracy is failing today as a model. Before we continue to push democracy on others, westerners should read and debate this informed, smart, readable book that identifies the fundamental problem and raises important questions about the future of democracy.'
Karen J. Alter, Norman Dwight Harris Professor of International Relations, Northwestern University
'This book teaches us a vital lesson. The roots of democracy's ills today are not merely economic or cultural but rather are found within the structure of our democracies themselves: they are simply not democratic enough. The implications are provocative, essential, and far-reaching.'
Daniel Ziblatt, co-author of How Democracies Die
Karen J. Alter, Norman Dwight Harris Professor of International Relations, Northwestern University
'This book teaches us a vital lesson. The roots of democracy's ills today are not merely economic or cultural but rather are found within the structure of our democracies themselves: they are simply not democratic enough. The implications are provocative, essential, and far-reaching.'
Daniel Ziblatt, co-author of How Democracies Die