Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Der Europäische Gerichtshof als Prinzipal, Agent und Akteur (eBook, PDF)]( "Der Europäische Gerichtshof als Prinzipal, Agent und Akteur (eBook, PDF)")
Der Europäische Gerichtshof als Prinzipal, Agent und Akteur (eBook, PDF)13,99 €![Enforcement of Judgements of the East African Court of Justice. Legal Application and Binding Nature (eBook, PDF)]( "Enforcement of Judgements of the East African Court of Justice. Legal Application and Binding Nature (eBook, PDF)")
Enforcement of Judgements of the East African Court of Justice. Legal Application and Binding Nature (eBook, PDF)29,99 €![Der Supreme Court als Motor des Verfassungswandels in den USA (eBook, PDF)]( "Der Supreme Court als Motor des Verfassungswandels in den USA (eBook, PDF)")
Der Supreme Court als Motor des Verfassungswandels in den USA (eBook, PDF)13,99 €![Is economic integration the motor of all European Integration? (eBook, PDF)]( "Is economic integration the motor of all European Integration? (eBook, PDF)")
Is economic integration the motor of all European Integration? (eBook, PDF)13,99 €![The Right to Strike under the European Court of Human Rights (eBook, PDF)]( "The Right to Strike under the European Court of Human Rights (eBook, PDF)")
The Right to Strike under the European Court of Human Rights (eBook, PDF)15,99 €![EU Law. Direct and Indirect Effect (eBook, PDF)]( "EU Law. Direct and Indirect Effect (eBook, PDF)")
EU Law. Direct and Indirect Effect (eBook, PDF)8,99 €![Implementation of the Decisions of the European Court for Human Rights in Albania (eBook, PDF)]( "Implementation of the Decisions of the European Court for Human Rights in Albania (eBook, PDF)")
Implementation of the Decisions of the European Court for Human Rights in Albania (eBook, PDF)5,99 €
Essay from the year 2016 in the subject Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 69 Prozent (1,7), Cardiff University, language: English, abstract: The question of the role of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in the process of European integration has been a matter of long-standing academic dispute between neo-functionalists and intergovernmentalists. In this essay it will be argued that the ECJ can be seen as an engine of European integration but the court – founded along with the other core institutions of the European Union (EU) in the 1950s – depends on the assistance of other actors. The explanation of this assertion is unfolded in three steps. At first this paper will provide a brief overview of neo-functionalism and intergovernmentalism and their dispute concerning the ECJ. Secondly, the ‘magic triangle’ (Vauchez 2008, p. 8) consisting of ‘direct effect’, ‘supremacy’ and ‘preliminary ruling’ – which allows the ECJ to have an impact on the integration process – will be examined and it will be explained why these three mentioned rules are so important for the European legal order. Thirdly, it is claimed that there are limits of the court’s judicial law-making and thus its role in the process of European integration should not be overestimated.