Bob Brecher

Torture and the Ticking Bomb (eBook, ePUB)

• Format: ePub

Produktbeschreibung

This timely and passionate book is the first to address itself to Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz's controversial arguments for the limited use of interrogational torture and its legalisation. * Argues that the respectability Dershowitz's arguments confer on the view that torture is a legitimate weapon in the war on terror needs urgently to be countered * Takes on the advocates of torture on their own utilitarian grounds * Timely and passionately written, in an accessible, jargon-free style * Forms part of the provocative and timely Blackwell Public Philosophy series

---

Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.

Produktdetails

• Verlag: John Wiley & Sons
• Seitenzahl: 136
• Erscheinungstermin: 24. April 2017
• Englisch
• ISBN-13: 9781119431367
• Artikelnr.: 52559432

Autorenporträt

Bob Brecher is Reader in Moral Philosophy at the University of Brighton, UK and Director of its Centre for Applied Philosophy, Politics and Ethics. He is the author of two previous books, Anselm's Argument: the Logic of Divine Existence and Getting What You Want?: a Critique of Liberal Morality (1998). He has published widely in ethics and social and political philosophy and was the founding editor of the journal Res Publica.

Inhaltsangabe

Preface ix
1 Introduction 1
What is Torture? 3
Dershowitz on Interrogational Torture 6
Why Write about Torture? 8
The Agenda 11
2 The Fantasy of the Ticking Bomb Scenario 14
Dershowitz's Argument and the Ticking Bomb 14
Who Tortures? 21
Effectiveness and Time 24
Knowledge and Necessity 31
The Ticking Bomb Scenario: Conclusion 38
3 The Consequences of Normalizing Interrogational Torture 40
Some Clarifications 41
Three Positive Claims about the Consequences of Legalizing Interrogational
Torture 52
The Institutionalization of Interrogational Torture 57
A Torturous Society 72
4 Torture, Death and Philosophy 75
Torture 76
Torture, Death and Interrogation 79
Why No Decent Society Can Torture 84
Torture, the "War on Terror" and Intellectual Irresponsibility 85
But What if Torture Really is the Only Possible Way to Avoid Catastrophe?
86
Two Final Points 88
Notes 89
Bibliography 109
Index 117

Rezensionen

"Bob Brecher has accepted the challenge of the defenders oftorture in this excellent book." (Notre Dame PhilosophicalReviews, February 2009)

"(Dershowitz's) premise is subjected to a withering scrutiny inthis brilliant deconstruction by the moral philosopher Bob Brecher.In a comprehensive critique of the 'ticking bomb' hypothesis,Brecher exposes the moral and intellectual flaws in Dershowitz'sarguments and shows how easily such pragmatic rationalisations canopen the door to the creation of a 'tortuous society'. It's a taskthat Brecher accomplishes with grace, moral passion and unswervinglogic." (Red Pepper, March 2008)

"A splendid attack on the appalling idea of legalising torture."(Will Podmore)

"A salutary antidote to those who would waver on the issue[of torture]...Brecher opens up the wider utilitarianimplications that arise." (Planet Magazine)

"Brecher ... does not reflexively dismiss theadvocates of torture ... .He carefully cites the errors oftheir arguments, using logic, expert opinion, and moralreasoning." (PsycCritiques)"Brecher relentlessly deconstructs the most misleading hypotheticalof our time. His lively and valuable book shows that even 'noblecause' torture is always counterproductive."
-Geoffrey Robertson QC, Doughty StreetChambers

"Quite simply, this book is the most powerful and comprehensivechallenge available to a piece of intellectual fraud having widecommerce today - that under some hypothetical situation theinfliction of pain to break another's will is morallyjustifiable. The ticking bomb, in Brecher's analysis, is afantasy that hardly yields grounds sufficient for the employment ofinterrogational torture. Here the philosopher's role towardsthat fantasy is quite clear: debunk it!"
-Gabriel Palmer-Fernandez, Youngstown StateUniversity