This book explores U.S.-Taiwan-China relations during both the Trump and Biden administrations, revealing how policy changes under both presidents have impacted Washington's decades-long strategic policy framework for Cross-Strait Relations.
Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, HR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.
'Professor Chen has applied his command of existing literature and proven skills in carefully crafted and clearly written scholarship to go beyond available publications in this comprehensive assessment of the actions and motives of the two most recent US presidents regarding the sensitive issues involved in US-Taiwan-China relations.' - Professor Robert Sutter, George Washington University, USA.
'Professor Chen lucidly traces the United States's gradual movement away from a liberal internationalist foreign policy and toward a more nationalistic direction. He argues that, while America's One China Policy has become increasingly anachronistic and untenable by changing political and security realities, it has maintained an anchoring function that, if abandoned, risks escalating into more serious Sino-American collisions.' - Professor June Teufel Dreyer, University of Miami, USA.
'Chen offers a clear and cogent analysis of changing U.S. policy toward China and Taiwan. Chen argues that U.S. Taiwan Strait policy is a result of an inward-looking "Jacksonian" nationalism and a U.S. Congress increasingly disillusioned with 'constructive engagement' with Beijing. His analysis of the movement away from a liberal internationalist U.S. foreign policy tradition toward a more nationalist direction finds that, as U.S.-PRC relations grow more conflictual and Washington renounces liberal engagement with China, the changing security and political realities challenge the maintenance of America's venerable OneChina/strategic ambiguity policy.' - Elizabeth Larus, University of Mary Washington, USA.
'Dean Chen has once again produced a theoretically rich and empirically concise treatment of US-China relations that tracks the ideational shift in US strategic interests and policy perspectives from Obama to Trump and now Biden. Few scholars have so elegantly chronicled the transition of American foreign policy from Wilsonian liberal internationalism of the Post-War era to what appears to be an emerging Jacksonian nationalism.' - Hans Stockton, University of St. Thomas Houston, USA.
'Professor Chen lucidly traces the United States's gradual movement away from a liberal internationalist foreign policy and toward a more nationalistic direction. He argues that, while America's One China Policy has become increasingly anachronistic and untenable by changing political and security realities, it has maintained an anchoring function that, if abandoned, risks escalating into more serious Sino-American collisions.' - Professor June Teufel Dreyer, University of Miami, USA.
'Chen offers a clear and cogent analysis of changing U.S. policy toward China and Taiwan. Chen argues that U.S. Taiwan Strait policy is a result of an inward-looking "Jacksonian" nationalism and a U.S. Congress increasingly disillusioned with 'constructive engagement' with Beijing. His analysis of the movement away from a liberal internationalist U.S. foreign policy tradition toward a more nationalist direction finds that, as U.S.-PRC relations grow more conflictual and Washington renounces liberal engagement with China, the changing security and political realities challenge the maintenance of America's venerable OneChina/strategic ambiguity policy.' - Elizabeth Larus, University of Mary Washington, USA.
'Dean Chen has once again produced a theoretically rich and empirically concise treatment of US-China relations that tracks the ideational shift in US strategic interests and policy perspectives from Obama to Trump and now Biden. Few scholars have so elegantly chronicled the transition of American foreign policy from Wilsonian liberal internationalism of the Post-War era to what appears to be an emerging Jacksonian nationalism.' - Hans Stockton, University of St. Thomas Houston, USA.