1,99 €
1,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
Sofort per Download lieferbar
payback
0 °P sammeln
1,99 €
1,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
Sofort per Download lieferbar

Alle Infos zum eBook verschenken
payback
0 °P sammeln
Als Download kaufen
1,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
Sofort per Download lieferbar
payback
0 °P sammeln
Jetzt verschenken
1,99 €
inkl. MwSt.
Sofort per Download lieferbar

Alle Infos zum eBook verschenken
payback
0 °P sammeln
  • Format: ePub

In "Was General Thomas Slow at Nashville?" historian Henry V. Boynton meticulously investigates the controversial performance of Union General George H. Thomas during the pivotal Battle of Nashville in December 1864. Through detailed analysis of military strategies, troop movements, and contemporaneous accounts, Boynton scrutinizes the perceptions of Thomas's actions, contrasting popular opinion with evidence from battlefield reports and military dispatches. The book's narrative blends rigorous scholarship with vivid storytelling, situating the debate within the larger context of the American…mehr

  • Geräte: eReader
  • ohne Kopierschutz
  • eBook Hilfe
  • Größe: 0.83MB
  • FamilySharing(5)
Produktbeschreibung
In "Was General Thomas Slow at Nashville?" historian Henry V. Boynton meticulously investigates the controversial performance of Union General George H. Thomas during the pivotal Battle of Nashville in December 1864. Through detailed analysis of military strategies, troop movements, and contemporaneous accounts, Boynton scrutinizes the perceptions of Thomas's actions, contrasting popular opinion with evidence from battlefield reports and military dispatches. The book's narrative blends rigorous scholarship with vivid storytelling, situating the debate within the larger context of the American Civil War and the complexities of command and leadership in wartime. Henry V. Boynton, an esteemed historian and Civil War expert, served as an officer in the Union Army during the conflict he so passionately studies. His on-the-ground experiences and post-war reflections shaped his critical perspective on military leadership and history. Boynton's dedication to uncovering the truths behind historical narratives is evident in this work, as he seeks to illuminate the realities of General Thomas's performance, countering enduring myths with well-researched evidence. This book is a must-read for Civil War enthusiasts, scholars, and anyone interested in the nuances of military leadership. Boynton's gripping examination not only clarifies Thomas's role at Nashville but also invites readers to reassess the judgments of military leaders in historical discourse. It challenges preconceived notions, fostering a deeper understanding of the complexities of war.

Dieser Download kann aus rechtlichen Gründen nur mit Rechnungsadresse in A, B, BG, CY, CZ, D, DK, EW, E, FIN, F, GR, H, IRL, I, LT, L, LR, M, NL, PL, P, R, S, SLO, SK ausgeliefert werden.

Autorenporträt
Henry Van Ness Boynton (1835-1905) was an influential figure in Civil War historiography, known for his scholarship and contributions as a historian, journalist, and soldier. Boynton's military service as a Union officer during the Civil War laid the groundwork for his later works as a writer, where he often engaged in debates over controversial wartime decisions and legacies of military leaders. His enduring interest in military history and critiques of the war's strategic aspects are evident in his tract, 'Was General Thomas Slow at Nashville?' A polemical work centered around General George H. Thomas's conduct during the Battle of Nashville, Boynton ardently defends the General against criticisms of tardiness during the pivotal 1864 conflict, which played a significant role in the Union's victory. Boynton's literary style was acutely analytical, driven by a desire to correct historical inaccuracies and defend the reputations of military officers whom he felt were unjustly maligned. His meticulous attention to military records and reports showcased his commitment to detailed research and factual integrity. While Boynton was not prolific, his work did influence Civil War historiography by prompting discussions on the accuracy and interpretation of military history. His voice added to the broader narrative of the American Civil War, giving insight into the complexities of leadership, decision-making, and the contentious nature of historical memory.