Caroline Henckels examines how investment tribunals should balance competing state and investor interests in determining state liability in regulatory disputes.
Caroline Henckels examines how investment tribunals should balance competing state and investor interests in determining state liability in regulatory disputes.
Caroline Henckels is Senior Lecturer in Law at Monash University, Melbourne, and was previously Vice-Chancellor's Postdoctoral Research Fellow in Law at the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Inhaltsangabe
1. Introduction 2. Proportionality and deference in theoretical perspective 3. Operationalizing deference in the context of proportionality analysis: comparative approaches 4. Methods of review employed by investment tribunals in regulatory disputes 5. The development of an institutionally sensitive approach to proportionality analysis in investor-state arbitration 6. Other issues affecting the method and standard of review in investor-state arbitration Conclusion.
1. Introduction 2. Proportionality and deference in theoretical perspective 3. Operationalizing deference in the context of proportionality analysis: comparative approaches 4. Methods of review employed by investment tribunals in regulatory disputes 5. The development of an institutionally sensitive approach to proportionality analysis in investor-state arbitration 6. Other issues affecting the method and standard of review in investor-state arbitration Conclusion.
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309
