Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Der Begriff des Verbrauchers im nationalen und europäischen Recht]( "Der Begriff des Verbrauchers im nationalen und europäischen Recht")
Der Begriff des Verbrauchers im nationalen und europäischen Recht17,95 €![Taxtopia]( "Taxtopia")
Taxtopia11,99 €![Self-Help, Private Debt Collection and the Concomitant Risks]( "Self-Help, Private Debt Collection and the Concomitant Risks")
Self-Help, Private Debt Collection and the Concomitant Risks74,99 €![Haushalt und Finanzierung der Europäischen Union]( "Haushalt und Finanzierung der Europäischen Union")
Haushalt und Finanzierung der Europäischen Union17,95 €![Islamische Wirtschafts- und Finanzphilosophie. Die EU-Strategie gegen die Finanzierung des Terrorismus]( "Islamische Wirtschafts- und Finanzphilosophie. Die EU-Strategie gegen die Finanzierung des Terrorismus")
Islamische Wirtschafts- und Finanzphilosophie. Die EU-Strategie gegen die Finanzierung des Terrorismus17,95 €![Verrechnungspreise international verbundener Unternehmen]( "Verrechnungspreise international verbundener Unternehmen")
Verrechnungspreise international verbundener Unternehmen279,00 €![A Legal Guide to United States Business Organizations]( "A Legal Guide to United States Business Organizations")
A Legal Guide to United States Business Organizations37,99 €
Constitutional litigation on school finance equity has raged for decades with little clear understanding of its achievements. The role of the courts has been complex, and they have enjoyed mixed success in affecting school finance reform.Careful examination of court rulings and legislative responses, education revenue and expenditures, and the political, economic, and social context of reform in Missouri and Kansas, states with similar economic and political geographies and contrasting court experiences, shed light on the reasons for such different experiences.Multiple variables were analyzed to attempt to explain these different reform results, including the language and procedures of the courts themselves, the political culture of the states, measures of state wealth and tax burden, and demographic components of the states' populations. The key difference between Missouri and Kansas was the level of court involvement itself and the initial expenditure and equity levels. The experiences of Missouri and Kansas with litigation-inspired school finance reform demonstrate that courts can and do have a significant impact on the equitable distribution of resources for students.