Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Current Air Base Ground Defense Doctrine: Are We Postured to Meet the Expectations of the AEF?]( "Current Air Base Ground Defense Doctrine: Are We Postured to Meet the Expectations of the AEF?")
Current Air Base Ground Defense Doctrine: Are We Postured to Meet the Expectations of the AEF?64,99 €![Command and Control: Does Current U.S. Army Tactical Command and Control Doctrine Meet the Requirement for Today's High Intensity Battlefie]( "Command and Control: Does Current U.S. Army Tactical Command and Control Doctrine Meet the Requirement for Today's High Intensity Battlefie")
Command and Control: Does Current U.S. Army Tactical Command and Control Doctrine Meet the Requirement for Today's High Intensity Battlefie63,99 €![Interrogation: Is the US Army Equipped and Trained to Meet the Present Challenges in Today's Contemporary Operational Environment?]( "Interrogation: Is the US Army Equipped and Trained to Meet the Present Challenges in Today's Contemporary Operational Environment?")
Interrogation: Is the US Army Equipped and Trained to Meet the Present Challenges in Today's Contemporary Operational Environment?63,99 €![How Does the Political Nature of the Defense Acquisition Process Affect Cost Growth]( "How Does the Political Nature of the Defense Acquisition Process Affect Cost Growth")
How Does the Political Nature of the Defense Acquisition Process Affect Cost Growth63,99 €![Faster Is Better: Can the USAF Acquisition Process Be Saiv'd?]( "Faster Is Better: Can the USAF Acquisition Process Be Saiv'd?")
Faster Is Better: Can the USAF Acquisition Process Be Saiv'd?64,99 €![The Air Force Acquisition Process and the Expeditionary Aerospace Force Challenge]( "The Air Force Acquisition Process and the Expeditionary Aerospace Force Challenge")
The Air Force Acquisition Process and the Expeditionary Aerospace Force Challenge63,99 €![Operational Functions of U.S. Army Contingency Headquarters: Do They Meet the Requirements for the Operational Level of War?]( "Operational Functions of U.S. Army Contingency Headquarters: Do They Meet the Requirements for the Operational Level of War?")
Operational Functions of U.S. Army Contingency Headquarters: Do They Meet the Requirements for the Operational Level of War?64,99 €
Since the 1950s the acquisition system has been modified and changed many times to clean up the system and prevent fraud, waste, and mismanagement. However, the system had become too big, cumbersome, and unresponsive to meet operational needs. In 1985 the President's Blue Ribbon Commission on Defense Management, the Packard Commission, was established to make recommendations for new reform. In June 1986 the commission published its final report that made sweeping recommendations. Those recommendations were implemented by the National Security Decision Directive 219 in April 1986, the Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act in October 1986, and the Defense Management Report in July 1989. Since then, many changes have occurred that have improved operational perspective and jointness in acquisition planning, linked national security objectives to system acquisition, and improved acquisition management. The changes that have taken place so far have not solved all of the problems in the acquisition system, but they have had a major impact in improving system and ensuring that a new weapon system will meet operational needs.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.