Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Virginia Company]( "Virginia Company")
Virginia Company22,99 €![Flue Cured Virginia Tobacco Growing and Sustainable Livelihoods]( "Flue Cured Virginia Tobacco Growing and Sustainable Livelihoods")
Flue Cured Virginia Tobacco Growing and Sustainable Livelihoods36,99 €![Inflation Targeting vs. Monetary Targeting]( "Inflation Targeting vs. Monetary Targeting")
Inflation Targeting vs. Monetary Targeting26,99 €![Inflation Targeting in Zambia]( "Inflation Targeting in Zambia")
Inflation Targeting in Zambia32,99 €![Inflation Targeting in Egypt]( "Inflation Targeting in Egypt")
Inflation Targeting in Egypt23,99 €![Towards inflation Targeting Approach in Ethiopia]( "Towards inflation Targeting Approach in Ethiopia")
Towards inflation Targeting Approach in Ethiopia44,99 €![Evaluating the Performance of Inflation Targeting]( "Evaluating the Performance of Inflation Targeting")
Evaluating the Performance of Inflation Targeting32,99 €
The economic costs of reducing nutrient loadings are often not taken into account during development. In this study, sector targeting is used to minimize the total cost of nutrient reduction by targeting sectors with lower costs per unit of pollution reduction. This study focuses on targeting nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) loading reductions from three sectors: agricultural, point source, and urban non-point source, in the North Fork watershed. Linear programming optimization models were created to determine an optimal solution that minimized total compliance cost to implement Best Management Practices subject to targeted loading reductions in N and P in the watershed. The optimal solution for each sector using uniform allocation and sector targeting were compared for N and P loading reductions separately and N and P reductions simultaneously.The difference between sector targeting and uniform allocation showed the sector targeting was the more cost effective approach to achievethe desired nutrient reduction compared to uniform allocation. This study implies that both stakeholders and policymakers can use sector targeting to achieve nutrient reduction goals at lower costs.