Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Should the OECD Tax Model and Guidelines be adopted by Egypt?]( "Should the OECD Tax Model and Guidelines be adopted by Egypt?")
Should the OECD Tax Model and Guidelines be adopted by Egypt?23,99 €![Is cloud computing challenging the concept of permanent establishment?]( "Is cloud computing challenging the concept of permanent establishment?")
Is cloud computing challenging the concept of permanent establishment?23,99 €![The Concept of Beneficial Ownership in the OECD Model Tax Convention]( "The Concept of Beneficial Ownership in the OECD Model Tax Convention")
The Concept of Beneficial Ownership in the OECD Model Tax Convention26,99 €![Taxation of Digitalised Companies in the European Union]( "Taxation of Digitalised Companies in the European Union")
Taxation of Digitalised Companies in the European Union24,99 €![Should the OECD and its material be adopted by Egypt?]( "Should the OECD and its material be adopted by Egypt?")
Should the OECD and its material be adopted by Egypt?23,99 €![Controversial Topics In International Taxation: U.S.A., OECD & Brazil]( "Controversial Topics In International Taxation: U.S.A., OECD & Brazil")
Controversial Topics In International Taxation: U.S.A., OECD & Brazil32,99 €![The Urgently Needed New International Framework: Unitary Taxation]( "The Urgently Needed New International Framework: Unitary Taxation")
The Urgently Needed New International Framework: Unitary Taxation32,99 €
There are lots of debates concerning the exact role of OECD Commentaries in tax treaty interpretation process. The current work tries to asses the role of the commentaries for interpretation of DTAs concluded between Non-OECD and OECD states. In order to reach the above goal the legal status of the OECD Commentaries under public international law in particular the interrelation of the Commentaries with the Articles of 31 and 32 of the Vienna Convention is discussed. The great importance is attached to the case law analysis of the Non-OECD states to find out how the courts consider the Commentaries and to what extent they are bound with it. The work also triggers the problem of ambulatory and static interpretation of the Commentaries as well as the problem of using "foreign law" in different legal traditions.