Automated fault analysis is not widely used within chemical processing industries due to problems of cost and performance as well as the difficulty of modeling process behavior at needed levels of detail. In response, this book presents the method of minimal evidence (MOME), a model-based diagnostic strategy that facilitates the development and implementation of optimal automated process fault analyzers. With this book as their guide, readers have a powerful new tool for ensuring the safety and reliability of any chemical processing system.
Automated fault analysis is not widely used within chemical processing industries due to problems of cost and performance as well as the difficulty of modeling process behavior at needed levels of detail. In response, this book presents the method of minimal evidence (MOME), a model-based diagnostic strategy that facilitates the development and implementation of optimal automated process fault analyzers. With this book as their guide, readers have a powerful new tool for ensuring the safety and reliability of any chemical processing system.
Dr. Richard J. Fickelscherer is currently a licensed Professional Engineer and is a principal owner of FALCONEER Technologies, LLC. He has developed and implemented programs which provide various supervisory control functions for DuPont, Exxon-Mobile, Merck Pharmaceuticals, Koch Industries, the FMC Corporation and many other client companies. Dr. Daniel L. Chester joined the Department of Computer and Information Sciences at the University of Delaware in 1980, where he soon became one of the principal investigators on the FALCON project. He is currently Associate Chair in the computer science department at the University of Delaware. He has been involved in the creation and development of three companies, one of which is FALCONEER Technologies, LLC. He is also co-inventor in five U.S. patents.
Inhaltsangabe
Dedication Table of Contents Foreword Preface Acknowledgements Chapter 1. Motivations for Automating Process Fault Analysis 1.1 Introduction 1.2 CPI Trends to Date 1.3 The Changing Role for the Process Operators in Plant Operations 1.4 Methods Currently Used to Perform Process Fault Management 1.5 Limitations of Human Operators in Performing Process Fault Management 1.6 The Role of Automated Process Fault Analysis 1.7 Anticipated Future CPI Trends 1.8 Process Fault Analysis Concept Terminology Chapter 2. Method of Minimal Evidence: Model-Based Reasoning 2.1 Overview 2.2 Introduction 2.3 Method of Minimal Evidence Overview 2.4 Verifying the Validity and Accuracy of the Various Primary Models 2.5 Summary Chapter 3. Method of Minimal Evidence: Diagnostic Strategy Details 3.1 Overview 3.2 Introduction 3.3 MOME Diagnostic Strategy 3.4 A General Procedure for Developing and Verifying Competent Model-based 3.5 MOME SV & PFA Diagnostic Logic Compiler Motivations 3.6 MOME Diagnostic Strategy Summary Chapter 4. Method of Minimal Evidence: Fuzzy Logic Algorithm 4.1 Overview 4.2 Introduction 4.3 Fuzzy Logic Overview 4.4 MOME Fuzzy Logic Algorithm 4.5 Certainty Factor Calculation Review 4.6 MOME Fuzzy Logic Algorithm Summary Chapter 5. Method of Minimal Evidence: Criteria for Shrewdly Distribution Fault Analyzers and Strategic Process Sensor Placement 5.1 Overview 5.2 Criteria for Shrewdly Distributing Process Fault Analyzers 5.3 Criteria for Strategic Process Sensor Placement Chapter 6. Virtual SPC Analysis and Its Routine Use in Falconeer(TM) IV 6.1 Overview 6.2 Introduction 6.3 EWMA Calculations and Specific Virtual SPC Analysis Configurations 6.4 Virtual SPC Alarm Trigger Summary 6.5 Virtual SPC Analysis Conclusions Chapter 7. Process State Transistion Logic and Its Routine Use in Falconeer(TM) IV 7.1 Temporal Reasoning Philosophy 7.2 Introduction 7.3 State Identification Analysis Currently Used in Falconeer(TM) IV 7.4 State Identification Analysis Summary Chapter 8. Conclusions 8.1 Overview 8.2 Summary of the MOME Diagnostic Strategy 8.3 FALCON, FALCONEER and FALCONEER(TM) IV Actual KBS Application Performance Results 8.4 FALCONEER(TM) IV KBS Application Project Procedure 8.5 Optimal Automated Process Fault Analysis Conclusions Appendix A. Various Diagnostic Strategies for Automating Process Fault Analysis Appendix B. The Falcon Project Appendix C. Process State Transition Logic Used by the Original Falconeer KBS Appendix D. Falconeer(TM) IV Real-Time Suite Process Performance Solutions Demo Description
Dedication Table of Contents Foreword Preface Acknowledgements Chapter 1. Motivations for Automating Process Fault Analysis 1.1 Introduction 1.2 CPI Trends to Date 1.3 The Changing Role for the Process Operators in Plant Operations 1.4 Methods Currently Used to Perform Process Fault Management 1.5 Limitations of Human Operators in Performing Process Fault Management 1.6 The Role of Automated Process Fault Analysis 1.7 Anticipated Future CPI Trends 1.8 Process Fault Analysis Concept Terminology Chapter 2. Method of Minimal Evidence: Model-Based Reasoning 2.1 Overview 2.2 Introduction 2.3 Method of Minimal Evidence Overview 2.4 Verifying the Validity and Accuracy of the Various Primary Models 2.5 Summary Chapter 3. Method of Minimal Evidence: Diagnostic Strategy Details 3.1 Overview 3.2 Introduction 3.3 MOME Diagnostic Strategy 3.4 A General Procedure for Developing and Verifying Competent Model-based 3.5 MOME SV & PFA Diagnostic Logic Compiler Motivations 3.6 MOME Diagnostic Strategy Summary Chapter 4. Method of Minimal Evidence: Fuzzy Logic Algorithm 4.1 Overview 4.2 Introduction 4.3 Fuzzy Logic Overview 4.4 MOME Fuzzy Logic Algorithm 4.5 Certainty Factor Calculation Review 4.6 MOME Fuzzy Logic Algorithm Summary Chapter 5. Method of Minimal Evidence: Criteria for Shrewdly Distribution Fault Analyzers and Strategic Process Sensor Placement 5.1 Overview 5.2 Criteria for Shrewdly Distributing Process Fault Analyzers 5.3 Criteria for Strategic Process Sensor Placement Chapter 6. Virtual SPC Analysis and Its Routine Use in Falconeer(TM) IV 6.1 Overview 6.2 Introduction 6.3 EWMA Calculations and Specific Virtual SPC Analysis Configurations 6.4 Virtual SPC Alarm Trigger Summary 6.5 Virtual SPC Analysis Conclusions Chapter 7. Process State Transistion Logic and Its Routine Use in Falconeer(TM) IV 7.1 Temporal Reasoning Philosophy 7.2 Introduction 7.3 State Identification Analysis Currently Used in Falconeer(TM) IV 7.4 State Identification Analysis Summary Chapter 8. Conclusions 8.1 Overview 8.2 Summary of the MOME Diagnostic Strategy 8.3 FALCON, FALCONEER and FALCONEER(TM) IV Actual KBS Application Performance Results 8.4 FALCONEER(TM) IV KBS Application Project Procedure 8.5 Optimal Automated Process Fault Analysis Conclusions Appendix A. Various Diagnostic Strategies for Automating Process Fault Analysis Appendix B. The Falcon Project Appendix C. Process State Transition Logic Used by the Original Falconeer KBS Appendix D. Falconeer(TM) IV Real-Time Suite Process Performance Solutions Demo Description
Es gelten unsere Allgemeinen Geschäftsbedingungen: www.buecher.de/agb
Impressum
www.buecher.de ist ein Shop der buecher.de GmbH & Co. KG Bürgermeister-Wegele-Str. 12, 86167 Augsburg Amtsgericht Augsburg HRA 13309
