Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Is U.S. Army Rear Area and Base Security Doctrine Sound for Sustaining Operations on the Noncontiguous Nonlinear Battlefield?]( "Is U.S. Army Rear Area and Base Security Doctrine Sound for Sustaining Operations on the Noncontiguous Nonlinear Battlefield?")
Is U.S. Army Rear Area and Base Security Doctrine Sound for Sustaining Operations on the Noncontiguous Nonlinear Battlefield?63,99 €![Comparison of F-15e and F-16 Dynamic Targeting Persistence in a Fuel-Limited Environment]( "Comparison of F-15e and F-16 Dynamic Targeting Persistence in a Fuel-Limited Environment")
Comparison of F-15e and F-16 Dynamic Targeting Persistence in a Fuel-Limited Environment63,99 €![Dynamic Nonlinear Bending and Torsion of a Cantilever Beam]( "Dynamic Nonlinear Bending and Torsion of a Cantilever Beam")
Dynamic Nonlinear Bending and Torsion of a Cantilever Beam63,99 €![Air Base Defense Outside the Wire: Air Support for Defending Expeditionary Air Bases on the Nonlinear Battlefield]( "Air Base Defense Outside the Wire: Air Support for Defending Expeditionary Air Bases on the Nonlinear Battlefield")
Air Base Defense Outside the Wire: Air Support for Defending Expeditionary Air Bases on the Nonlinear Battlefield63,99 €![Targeting for Effect: Analytical Framework for Counterland Operations]( "Targeting for Effect: Analytical Framework for Counterland Operations")
Targeting for Effect: Analytical Framework for Counterland Operations63,99 €![Improving Time Sensitive Targeting Operations with Decentralized Engagement Authority]( "Improving Time Sensitive Targeting Operations with Decentralized Engagement Authority")
Improving Time Sensitive Targeting Operations with Decentralized Engagement Authority63,99 €![Using the Targeting Process to Synchronize Information Operations at the Tactical Level]( "Using the Targeting Process to Synchronize Information Operations at the Tactical Level")
Using the Targeting Process to Synchronize Information Operations at the Tactical Level63,99 €
Since its official inception during Desert Storm, dynamic targeting procedures evolved while the battlefield changed from traditional linear operations in a contiguous environment to nonlinear operations for a noncontiguous environment. The military dominance during Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and Operations Iraqi Freedom (OIF) was partially based on successfully prosecuting dynamic targets. The process for engaging targets that meet Combined Forces Commander (CFC) or component commander objectives must become more efficient and effective in future conflicts to maintain our battlespace superiority. This paper addresses the differences between dynamic targeting and time sensitive targeting (TST), how dynamic targeting is becoming a fundamental part of nonlinear operations on a noncontiguous battlefield, and how it can further complicate the targeting process. The key danger of conducting dynamic targeting operations is shifting emphasis from successfully completing tasks and achieving strategic and operational objectives to simply servicing targets as they are detected without regard to the campaign plan or battlefield effects. Despite great successes in both OEF and OIF, dynamic targeting for nonlinear operations on a noncontiguous battlefield must continue to improve in efficiency and effectiveness for the U.S. to continue its military dominance over future adversaries.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.