Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Second Language Vocabulary Learning]( "Second Language Vocabulary Learning")
Second Language Vocabulary Learning39,99 €![Assessing the Human-Animal Bond]( "Assessing the Human-Animal Bond")
Assessing the Human-Animal Bond33,99 €![The origin of consciousness. A review of several major theories and animal consciousness possibility and accessibility]( "The origin of consciousness. A review of several major theories and animal consciousness possibility and accessibility")
The origin of consciousness. A review of several major theories and animal consciousness possibility and accessibility17,95 €![Religiosity, Cognitive Dissonance and Attitude]( "Religiosity, Cognitive Dissonance and Attitude")
Religiosity, Cognitive Dissonance and Attitude17,95 €![Faith and Altruism. Exploring the Psychological Underpinnings of Compassionate Acts]( "Faith and Altruism. Exploring the Psychological Underpinnings of Compassionate Acts")
Faith and Altruism. Exploring the Psychological Underpinnings of Compassionate Acts16,95 €![Recognising and Responding to Animal Emotion in a Shared World]( "Recognising and Responding to Animal Emotion in a Shared World")
Recognising and Responding to Animal Emotion in a Shared World68,99 €![Curiosity and Information Seeking in Animal and Human Behavior]( "Curiosity and Information Seeking in Animal and Human Behavior")
Curiosity and Information Seeking in Animal and Human Behavior39,99 €
Following the horse meat scandal of 2012 the concept of the meat paradox was created: engaging in the consumption of meat whilst simultaneously disliking hurting animals. The theory of cognitive dissonance suggests that farm animals are denied mind in order to relieve negative feelings associated with eating animals. The present study explores the hypothesis that animals will be attributed mind based on their category. The effect of the presentation of the respective animal (e.g. text/image) on the attribution of animal mind is also tested, as well as association between mind attitudes toward animals. 69 participants recruited using the Hanover social research website and University of Worcester research scheme completed this study.
Participants completed a demographic questionnaire followed by the "attitudes towards animals scale" (ATAS) and an animal mental capacity rating task in either the control (text) or experimental condition (image) conditions. The animals formed a number of categories, including food and companion animals.
Participants completed a demographic questionnaire followed by the "attitudes towards animals scale" (ATAS) and an animal mental capacity rating task in either the control (text) or experimental condition (image) conditions. The animals formed a number of categories, including food and companion animals.