Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Defense or Diplomacy? Geographic Combatant Commands]( "Defense or Diplomacy? Geographic Combatant Commands")
Defense or Diplomacy? Geographic Combatant Commands60,99 €![Missing in Action: Where Are the Air Force's Geographic Combatant Commanders?]( "Missing in Action: Where Are the Air Force's Geographic Combatant Commanders?")
Missing in Action: Where Are the Air Force's Geographic Combatant Commanders?60,99 €![Combatant Commands Informational Series: Uspacom]( "Combatant Commands Informational Series: Uspacom")
Combatant Commands Informational Series: Uspacom60,99 €![Meeting Combatant Commanders' Needs: The National Training Center as a Case Study]( "Meeting Combatant Commanders' Needs: The National Training Center as a Case Study")
Meeting Combatant Commanders' Needs: The National Training Center as a Case Study60,99 €![National Security Crisis Decision-Making: The Role of the Regional Combatant Commander]( "National Security Crisis Decision-Making: The Role of the Regional Combatant Commander")
National Security Crisis Decision-Making: The Role of the Regional Combatant Commander60,99 €![Time to Take Action: A Plan to Improve AMC's Warfighting Support for the Combatant Commander by Re-Allocating C-17 Assets in Support of the]( "Time to Take Action: A Plan to Improve AMC's Warfighting Support for the Combatant Commander by Re-Allocating C-17 Assets in Support of the")
Time to Take Action: A Plan to Improve AMC's Warfighting Support for the Combatant Commander by Re-Allocating C-17 Assets in Support of the60,99 €![Relevance: How the United States Air Force Can Continue to Provide Relevant Space Support to Combatant Commanders]( "Relevance: How the United States Air Force Can Continue to Provide Relevant Space Support to Combatant Commanders")
Relevance: How the United States Air Force Can Continue to Provide Relevant Space Support to Combatant Commanders60,99 €
The dominance of two services, the Army and the Navy, leading the geographic combatant commands is striking. Of the 80 geographic combatant commanders appointed since the National Security Act of 1947, 43 have come from the Army. The Navy follows with 26. The Marine Corps comes in third with 6, while the Air Force has had 5 selected. The Department of Defense should recognize the implications of a commander selection process that supports the domination of the geographic combatant commands by two of the four services. Continuing this practice stifles innovation by limiting the full exploration of ideas. The President, Secretary of Defense, and Congress should promote a paradigm for military leadership diversity that acknowledges service cultural differences and recognizes the value in those differences. Most significantly, the Department of Defense should internalize the perspectives of senior Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marine Corps leaders so the geographic combatant commands become more effective because of these differences. In turn, the services benefit by identifying more with the geographic combatant commands, setting in motion a virtuous cycle, which better serves the national interest.