Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Possible consequences of awarding non compensatory damages for breach of contract on Commercial Law]( "Possible consequences of awarding non compensatory damages for breach of contract on Commercial Law")
Possible consequences of awarding non compensatory damages for breach of contract on Commercial Law17,95 €![The ESM. A Breach of the Treaties?]( "The ESM. A Breach of the Treaties?")
The ESM. A Breach of the Treaties?42,95 €![Is the use of technological force by one state against another ¿ a so-called ¿cyber-attack¿ ¿ a breach of Article 2(4) of the UN Charter?]( "Is the use of technological force by one state against another ¿ a so-called ¿cyber-attack¿ ¿ a breach of Article 2(4) of the UN Charter?")
Is the use of technological force by one state against another ¿ a so-called ¿cyber-attack¿ ¿ a breach of Article 2(4) of the UN Charter?15,95 €![Israeli Settlement Expansion and the Breach of International Law]( "Israeli Settlement Expansion and the Breach of International Law")
Israeli Settlement Expansion and the Breach of International Law48,99 €![Comparative Remedies for Breach of Contract]( "Comparative Remedies for Breach of Contract")
Comparative Remedies for Breach of Contract124,99 €![The obligation to make reparation for a breach of Jus Cogens]( "The obligation to make reparation for a breach of Jus Cogens")
The obligation to make reparation for a breach of Jus Cogens23,99 €![International Enforcement Jurisdiction in Securities Law]( "International Enforcement Jurisdiction in Securities Law")
International Enforcement Jurisdiction in Securities Law27,95 €
Seminar paper from the year 2012 in the subject Law - Comparative Legal Systems, Comparative Law, grade: 1,0, Anglia Ruskin University (Lord Ashroft International Business School), course: Comparative Business Law, language: English, abstract: In this paper Germany and the United Kingdom are comparatively analysed. The focusis on breach of duty as a part of negligence whose other aspects will be shortlyillustrated as well.The aim of the paper is to show the differences between common law and civil lawstates by comparing a case that deals with the chosen aspect.The case that will be analysed deals with an accident in a wall climbing centre. It will bediscussed if the centre acted negligent for omitted instructions to the customer.It will become clear that even though contributory action of the customer is consideredthe club still breached its duty to take reasonable care.Moreover the English case will be applied under the German procedure. Again, the clubwill be held liable for breaching its duty of care.Based on the analysis of the case under both legal systems the similarities anddifferences will be explained.