Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![State Actor Threats in 2025]( "State Actor Threats in 2025")
State Actor Threats in 202560,99 €![Nonstate Actor Threats in 2025 Blue Horizons Scenarios]( "Nonstate Actor Threats in 2025 Blue Horizons Scenarios")
Nonstate Actor Threats in 2025 Blue Horizons Scenarios60,99 €![Combing the Underworld: Identification of South East Asian Non-State Actor Proliferation Networks, Nodes, and Chokepoints]( "Combing the Underworld: Identification of South East Asian Non-State Actor Proliferation Networks, Nodes, and Chokepoints")
Combing the Underworld: Identification of South East Asian Non-State Actor Proliferation Networks, Nodes, and Chokepoints60,99 €![Japanese Military Development: Expressed Threats Versus Programs and Policies]( "Japanese Military Development: Expressed Threats Versus Programs and Policies")
Japanese Military Development: Expressed Threats Versus Programs and Policies60,99 €![High Energy Laser on the Joint Strike Fighter a Reality in 2025?]( "High Energy Laser on the Joint Strike Fighter a Reality in 2025?")
High Energy Laser on the Joint Strike Fighter a Reality in 2025?61,99 €![Star Tek--Exploiting the Final Frontier: Counterspace Operations in 2025]( "Star Tek--Exploiting the Final Frontier: Counterspace Operations in 2025")
Star Tek--Exploiting the Final Frontier: Counterspace Operations in 202560,99 €![Safeguarding Canadian Arctic Sovereignty Against Conventional Threats]( "Safeguarding Canadian Arctic Sovereignty Against Conventional Threats")
Safeguarding Canadian Arctic Sovereignty Against Conventional Threats61,99 €
To evaluate properly the utility of a proposed technology, especially one developed for military purposes, one must also understand the context in which the developer will employ that technology. This is because the enemy is always trying to counter one's capabilities and render them ineffective. In addition, the military never operates freely - certain political considerations always govern (and restrain) the use of military force. As a result, when trying to determine the technologies in which the USAF should invest, the context in which they will be employed becomes paramount. To that end, the paper develops four scenarios surrounding state actor threats in the year 2025. The Wishful Thinking scenario describes a state whose military is materials-based and fights the US military in a large-scale, force-on-force conflict. The Information Immobilization adversary will also attempt to fight the US on the regular battlefield, but will do so using information-based systems to counter USAF capabilities.