Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Effects-Based Decision Making in the War On Terror]( "Effects-Based Decision Making in the War On Terror")
Effects-Based Decision Making in the War On Terror63,99 €![The Shadow of the Future: Infidel and Apostate-Government Cooperation in the War on Terror]( "The Shadow of the Future: Infidel and Apostate-Government Cooperation in the War on Terror")
The Shadow of the Future: Infidel and Apostate-Government Cooperation in the War on Terror63,99 €![Coast Guard Law Enforcement Detachments in the War on Terror]( "Coast Guard Law Enforcement Detachments in the War on Terror")
Coast Guard Law Enforcement Detachments in the War on Terror63,99 €![The Philippines as a Major Non-NATO Ally and the War on Terror]( "The Philippines as a Major Non-NATO Ally and the War on Terror")
The Philippines as a Major Non-NATO Ally and the War on Terror64,99 €![Assessing the Efficacy of Capital Punishment in the War on Terror Through the Lenses of History, Law, and Theory]( "Assessing the Efficacy of Capital Punishment in the War on Terror Through the Lenses of History, Law, and Theory")
Assessing the Efficacy of Capital Punishment in the War on Terror Through the Lenses of History, Law, and Theory63,99 €![Terror in the Horn?]( "Terror in the Horn?")
Terror in the Horn?63,99 €![Invisible Scalpel: Low-Visibility Operations in the War on Terror]( "Invisible Scalpel: Low-Visibility Operations in the War on Terror")
Invisible Scalpel: Low-Visibility Operations in the War on Terror63,99 €
This thesis discusses the two moral frameworks within which the United States can fight the war on terror. Since the war on terror is likely to be long, unlike previous conflicts fought over territory, and global in scale, the United States must mobilize and sustain domestic, international, and media support if it is to succeed. Operating within an accepted moral framework is the best way to achieve the necessary support. Criminal justice and just war are the two moral frameworks. The criminal justice framework denies terrorist groups all legitimacy, but has serious drawbacks in that it is designed specifically to protect the rights of those whom the government intends to prosecute. The just war framework allows all instruments of national power to be used against the enemy, but has serious drawbacks in that treating terrorists as legitimate combatants may encourage their behavior and allow them to seek overt support. Comparing terrorist groups to criminal organizations and to states shows that terrorist groups resemble states, in that their motivation is political rather than pecuniary.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.