Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Serbia¿NATO¿Russia after the Declaration of Kosovo Independence]( "Serbia¿NATO¿Russia after the Declaration of Kosovo Independence")
Serbia¿NATO¿Russia after the Declaration of Kosovo Independence36,99 €![The Real Project of the Century]( "The Real Project of the Century")
The Real Project of the Century18,99 €![In Defense of the Bush Doctrine]( "In Defense of the Bush Doctrine")
In Defense of the Bush Doctrine39,99 €![Ideas and the Use of Force in American Foreign Policy]( "Ideas and the Use of Force in American Foreign Policy")
Ideas and the Use of Force in American Foreign Policy103,99 €![The Position of Algeria in the Neoconservative Agenda from Bush to Obama]( "The Position of Algeria in the Neoconservative Agenda from Bush to Obama")
The Position of Algeria in the Neoconservative Agenda from Bush to Obama17,95 €![The Confucius Institutes and China''s Evolving Foreign Policy]( "The Confucius Institutes and China''s Evolving Foreign Policy")
The Confucius Institutes and China''s Evolving Foreign Policy38,99 €![Ethnic Markets and the Empowerment of ImmigrantWomen in America]( "Ethnic Markets and the Empowerment of ImmigrantWomen in America")
Ethnic Markets and the Empowerment of ImmigrantWomen in America51,99 €
The thesis argues that the foreign policy of the former U.S. Administration under G. W. Bush's leadership forms a coherent set of principles that can be called the Bush Doctrine. Four pillars of the Doctrine are identified and examined in detail: preventive war and war on terrorism, selective multilateralism, democratization and human dignity, and the maintenance of American military primacy. It is claimed then that the four pillars constitute a significant threat to the conduct of international relations based on rule of international law and institutions as well as do not promote the American foreign interests in long-run. The theoretical part of the work includes discussion of Realism and Liberal Internationalism as the main competing international relations theories. A conclusion is reached in favour of the Liberal Internationalist school of thought as forming more desirable and appropriate basis of the international order.