Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Implementation of the Directive 2007/66/EC in Latvia]( "Implementation of the Directive 2007/66/EC in Latvia")
Implementation of the Directive 2007/66/EC in Latvia32,99 €![Chemical Modification of Poly(Vinyl Chloride) and its Application]( "Chemical Modification of Poly(Vinyl Chloride) and its Application")
Chemical Modification of Poly(Vinyl Chloride) and its Application26,99 €![Protection of fundamental rights and freedoms and anti-terrorism legislation]( "Protection of fundamental rights and freedoms and anti-terrorism legislation")
Protection of fundamental rights and freedoms and anti-terrorism legislation39,99 €![Judicial Activism and Individual Freedoms in the Constitutional State]( "Judicial Activism and Individual Freedoms in the Constitutional State")
Judicial Activism and Individual Freedoms in the Constitutional State32,99 €![EC Regulation of Corporate Governance]( "EC Regulation of Corporate Governance")
EC Regulation of Corporate Governance126,99 €![Attorney Drafted E-2 Treaty-Investor Business Visa Application]( "Attorney Drafted E-2 Treaty-Investor Business Visa Application")
Attorney Drafted E-2 Treaty-Investor Business Visa Application125,99 €![The application of the IRDR in the Special Civil Courts]( "The application of the IRDR in the Special Civil Courts")
The application of the IRDR in the Special Civil Courts36,99 €
Horizontal application of European Community (EC) freedoms directly to private persons deserves to be charakterised as contradictive and methodologicaly inappropriate on the EC postenlargement period. The social rational of Europe was recognised by the Community policy objective, therefore widening the horizons of policy objectives. However, the human rights issues built into the social dimension of the EC policy, makes the necessity to balance between human rights values, on one hand, and EC freedoms, on the other hand. Such a dillemma within the judicial weighing of European Court of Justice (ECJ)would not problematical and innovative if ECJ would apply EC freedoms vertically, directly to memeber states and not to private persons. Moreover, ECJ judicial weighing is not an appropriate framework for balancing private interests between the subjects of private law, as was done by ECJ in Laval situation. The private persons enjoy the legal autonomy, which must be protected and theirprotection optimised, taking by starting point the weaker part, namely employee. Does ECJ establish a new hierarchy of values, balancing in Laval case to the benefits of employer and EC freedoms?