- Broschiertes Buch
- Merkliste
- Auf die Merkliste
- Bewerten Bewerten
- Teilen
- Produkt teilen
- Produkterinnerung
- Produkterinnerung
This edited collection brings together contributions from experts in criminal behaviour, civil law and jurisprudence. Suggesting that legal scholarship and practice will be increasingly enriched by an interdisciplinary study of law, mind and brain, this collection is a valuable addition to the emerging field of neurolaw.
This edited collection brings together contributions from experts in criminal behaviour, civil law and jurisprudence. Suggesting that legal scholarship and practice will be increasingly enriched by an interdisciplinary study of law, mind and brain, this collection is a valuable addition to the emerging field of neurolaw.
Produktdetails
- Produktdetails
- Verlag: Taylor & Francis
- Seitenzahl: 430
- Erscheinungstermin: 30. Juni 2020
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 231mm x 155mm x 28mm
- Gewicht: 676g
- ISBN-13: 9780367605629
- ISBN-10: 0367605627
- Artikelnr.: 66505094
- Verlag: Taylor & Francis
- Seitenzahl: 430
- Erscheinungstermin: 30. Juni 2020
- Englisch
- Abmessung: 231mm x 155mm x 28mm
- Gewicht: 676g
- ISBN-13: 9780367605629
- ISBN-10: 0367605627
- Artikelnr.: 66505094
Michael Freeman is Professor of English Law at University College London. His research interests are in cultural pluralism in particular in relation to the rights of children and in medical ethics particularly in relation to medically assisted reproduction.He has published in the areas of Family Law, Child Law and Policy, Children's Rights, Medicine, Ethics and the Law and Medical Law, Jurisprudence and Legal Theory. He is the author of over 40 books, editor of a large number of international journals and a Fellow of the British Academy.
Contents: Preface; Introduction
Michael Freeman and Oliver R. Goodenough; Law
responsibility and the brain
Dean Mobbs
Hakwan C. Lau
Owen D. Jones and Christopher D. Frith; Brain imaging and courtroom evidence: on the admissibility and persuasiveness of fMRI
Neal Feigenson; Mind the gap: problems of mind
body and brain in the criminal law
Lisa Claydon; Self-exclusion agreements: should we be free not to be free to ruin ourselves? Gambling
self-exclusion agreements and the brain
Florian Wagner-Von Papp; The problems with blaming
Theodore Y. Blumoff; Why distinguish 'mental' and 'physical' illness in law of involuntary treatment?
John Dawson and George Szmukler; A stable paradigm: revisiting capacity
vulnerability and the rights and claims of adolescents after Roper v. Simmons
Catherine J. Ross; Thinking like a child: legal implications of recent developments in brain research for juvenile offenders
Katharine Hunt Federle and Paul Skendelas; Legal implications of memory-dampening
Adam Kolber; Reframing the good death: enhancing choice in dying
neuroscience
end-of-life research and the potential of psychedelics in palliative care
Robin Mackenzie; Equality in exchange revisited from an evolutionary (genetic and cultural) point of view
Bart Du Laing; Just (and efficient?) compensation for government expropriations
Jeffrey Evans Stake; Examining the biological bases of family law: lessons to be learned from the evolutionary analysis of law
June Carbone and Naomi Cahn; Why do good people steal intellectual property?
Oliver R.Goodenough and Gregory Decker; Cues in the courtroom: when do they improve jurors' decisions?
Cheryl Boudreau; Reflections on reading: words and pictures and law
Christina Spiesel; Index.
Michael Freeman and Oliver R. Goodenough; Law
responsibility and the brain
Dean Mobbs
Hakwan C. Lau
Owen D. Jones and Christopher D. Frith; Brain imaging and courtroom evidence: on the admissibility and persuasiveness of fMRI
Neal Feigenson; Mind the gap: problems of mind
body and brain in the criminal law
Lisa Claydon; Self-exclusion agreements: should we be free not to be free to ruin ourselves? Gambling
self-exclusion agreements and the brain
Florian Wagner-Von Papp; The problems with blaming
Theodore Y. Blumoff; Why distinguish 'mental' and 'physical' illness in law of involuntary treatment?
John Dawson and George Szmukler; A stable paradigm: revisiting capacity
vulnerability and the rights and claims of adolescents after Roper v. Simmons
Catherine J. Ross; Thinking like a child: legal implications of recent developments in brain research for juvenile offenders
Katharine Hunt Federle and Paul Skendelas; Legal implications of memory-dampening
Adam Kolber; Reframing the good death: enhancing choice in dying
neuroscience
end-of-life research and the potential of psychedelics in palliative care
Robin Mackenzie; Equality in exchange revisited from an evolutionary (genetic and cultural) point of view
Bart Du Laing; Just (and efficient?) compensation for government expropriations
Jeffrey Evans Stake; Examining the biological bases of family law: lessons to be learned from the evolutionary analysis of law
June Carbone and Naomi Cahn; Why do good people steal intellectual property?
Oliver R.Goodenough and Gregory Decker; Cues in the courtroom: when do they improve jurors' decisions?
Cheryl Boudreau; Reflections on reading: words and pictures and law
Christina Spiesel; Index.
Contents: Preface; Introduction
Michael Freeman and Oliver R. Goodenough; Law
responsibility and the brain
Dean Mobbs
Hakwan C. Lau
Owen D. Jones and Christopher D. Frith; Brain imaging and courtroom evidence: on the admissibility and persuasiveness of fMRI
Neal Feigenson; Mind the gap: problems of mind
body and brain in the criminal law
Lisa Claydon; Self-exclusion agreements: should we be free not to be free to ruin ourselves? Gambling
self-exclusion agreements and the brain
Florian Wagner-Von Papp; The problems with blaming
Theodore Y. Blumoff; Why distinguish 'mental' and 'physical' illness in law of involuntary treatment?
John Dawson and George Szmukler; A stable paradigm: revisiting capacity
vulnerability and the rights and claims of adolescents after Roper v. Simmons
Catherine J. Ross; Thinking like a child: legal implications of recent developments in brain research for juvenile offenders
Katharine Hunt Federle and Paul Skendelas; Legal implications of memory-dampening
Adam Kolber; Reframing the good death: enhancing choice in dying
neuroscience
end-of-life research and the potential of psychedelics in palliative care
Robin Mackenzie; Equality in exchange revisited from an evolutionary (genetic and cultural) point of view
Bart Du Laing; Just (and efficient?) compensation for government expropriations
Jeffrey Evans Stake; Examining the biological bases of family law: lessons to be learned from the evolutionary analysis of law
June Carbone and Naomi Cahn; Why do good people steal intellectual property?
Oliver R.Goodenough and Gregory Decker; Cues in the courtroom: when do they improve jurors' decisions?
Cheryl Boudreau; Reflections on reading: words and pictures and law
Christina Spiesel; Index.
Michael Freeman and Oliver R. Goodenough; Law
responsibility and the brain
Dean Mobbs
Hakwan C. Lau
Owen D. Jones and Christopher D. Frith; Brain imaging and courtroom evidence: on the admissibility and persuasiveness of fMRI
Neal Feigenson; Mind the gap: problems of mind
body and brain in the criminal law
Lisa Claydon; Self-exclusion agreements: should we be free not to be free to ruin ourselves? Gambling
self-exclusion agreements and the brain
Florian Wagner-Von Papp; The problems with blaming
Theodore Y. Blumoff; Why distinguish 'mental' and 'physical' illness in law of involuntary treatment?
John Dawson and George Szmukler; A stable paradigm: revisiting capacity
vulnerability and the rights and claims of adolescents after Roper v. Simmons
Catherine J. Ross; Thinking like a child: legal implications of recent developments in brain research for juvenile offenders
Katharine Hunt Federle and Paul Skendelas; Legal implications of memory-dampening
Adam Kolber; Reframing the good death: enhancing choice in dying
neuroscience
end-of-life research and the potential of psychedelics in palliative care
Robin Mackenzie; Equality in exchange revisited from an evolutionary (genetic and cultural) point of view
Bart Du Laing; Just (and efficient?) compensation for government expropriations
Jeffrey Evans Stake; Examining the biological bases of family law: lessons to be learned from the evolutionary analysis of law
June Carbone and Naomi Cahn; Why do good people steal intellectual property?
Oliver R.Goodenough and Gregory Decker; Cues in the courtroom: when do they improve jurors' decisions?
Cheryl Boudreau; Reflections on reading: words and pictures and law
Christina Spiesel; Index.