Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Romanian identity and Gypsy otherness in Leonid Mamaliga Arcade]( "Romanian identity and Gypsy otherness in Leonid Mamaliga Arcade")
Romanian identity and Gypsy otherness in Leonid Mamaliga Arcade26,99 €![Romanian Folklore and its Archaic Heritage]( "Romanian Folklore and its Archaic Heritage")
Romanian Folklore and its Archaic Heritage95,99 €![Uvira the beautiful city soon to be razed from the map]( "Uvira the beautiful city soon to be razed from the map")
Uvira the beautiful city soon to be razed from the map16,99 €![Romanian and Moldovan]( "Romanian and Moldovan")
Romanian and Moldovan42,99 €![Translation study: The Mayans and forms of address]( "Translation study: The Mayans and forms of address")
Translation study: The Mayans and forms of address39,99 €![Places that the map can't contain: Poetics in the Anthropocene]( "Places that the map can't contain: Poetics in the Anthropocene")
Places that the map can't contain: Poetics in the Anthropocene55,00 €![Romanian Folklore and its Archaic Heritage]( "Romanian Folklore and its Archaic Heritage")
Romanian Folklore and its Archaic Heritage95,99 €
In recent years, syntactic literature distanced
itself from head movement in favour of phrasal
movement, particularly in the case of DP-internal
syntax. This book argues for the relevance of head
movement in accounting for DP-internal syntax in
Romanian. This is done by providing a syntactic map
of the structure and movements in Romanian DPs, from
the lower domain, the base position of N, to the DP
domain. First, it is argued that the affixation of
the definite article is derived by head movement of
the host, N or A, to D. Further, it is claimed that
postnominally surfacing APs are merged to the left
or to the right of the noun and the [N AP ComplNP]
word order is derived by head movement of N. Here,
the evidence hinges on the relative scope among APs.
Finally, it is proposed that cel heads a modifier
phrase, celP, where prenominal celP has the same
syntactic distribution and properties as
demonstratives, including the ability to license a
covert definite D; conversely, postnominal celP
lacks this property. This book is relevant for those
interested in the DP-internal syntax of Romance and
Balkan languages, X vs. XP movement and definiteness.
itself from head movement in favour of phrasal
movement, particularly in the case of DP-internal
syntax. This book argues for the relevance of head
movement in accounting for DP-internal syntax in
Romanian. This is done by providing a syntactic map
of the structure and movements in Romanian DPs, from
the lower domain, the base position of N, to the DP
domain. First, it is argued that the affixation of
the definite article is derived by head movement of
the host, N or A, to D. Further, it is claimed that
postnominally surfacing APs are merged to the left
or to the right of the noun and the [N AP ComplNP]
word order is derived by head movement of N. Here,
the evidence hinges on the relative scope among APs.
Finally, it is proposed that cel heads a modifier
phrase, celP, where prenominal celP has the same
syntactic distribution and properties as
demonstratives, including the ability to license a
covert definite D; conversely, postnominal celP
lacks this property. This book is relevant for those
interested in the DP-internal syntax of Romance and
Balkan languages, X vs. XP movement and definiteness.