Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![How Noise and Conversations effect X-Ray Baggage Screening Performance]( "How Noise and Conversations effect X-Ray Baggage Screening Performance")
How Noise and Conversations effect X-Ray Baggage Screening Performance23,99 €![Bimanual coordination and cognition in elderly people]( "Bimanual coordination and cognition in elderly people")
Bimanual coordination and cognition in elderly people19,99 €![Suicide Bombers]( "Suicide Bombers")
Suicide Bombers27,99 €![Expanding with Self-Regulated Learning:]( "Expanding with Self-Regulated Learning:")
Expanding with Self-Regulated Learning:36,99 €![Need, an Adequate Reason?]( "Need, an Adequate Reason?")
Need, an Adequate Reason?21,99 €![Implicit Motive Types and Managerial Skills]( "Implicit Motive Types and Managerial Skills")
Implicit Motive Types and Managerial Skills26,99 €![A Critical Examination of Overconfidence in the Financial Sector]( "A Critical Examination of Overconfidence in the Financial Sector")
A Critical Examination of Overconfidence in the Financial Sector36,99 €
For a long time, major research interests on eyewitness memory have been focused on the flaws and the malleability of memory. Recently a positive approach is emerging: What can be done to enhance eyewitness memory and protect it against misleading information? The current online study is on one hand in line with this modern approach by applying mental imagery to the suggestibility effect. On the other hand, the design of the original and defining study of Loftus & Palmer (1974) is transformed into a new setting. Participants (n = 272) had to watch a video of an (secure) indoor rock climber's fall. A 3x3 between-subjects design was conducted, using mental imagery (MI before, MI afterwards, Without MI) and leading question (Touch, Smash, Control) as factors. The dependent variable of the first part of the experiment was the speed estimate given in response to the leading question which implied different speed levels. After a one-week delay participants were questioned again. This time the dependent variable was the injury estimate. The statistical analysis revealed a significant difference in speed estimates depending on the leading question.