Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Integrating Joint Operations Beyond the Fscl: Is Current Doctrine Adequate?]( "Integrating Joint Operations Beyond the Fscl: Is Current Doctrine Adequate?")
Integrating Joint Operations Beyond the Fscl: Is Current Doctrine Adequate?63,99 €![Integrating Joint Operations Beyond the Fscl: Is Current Doctrine Adequate?]( "Integrating Joint Operations Beyond the Fscl: Is Current Doctrine Adequate?")
Integrating Joint Operations Beyond the Fscl: Is Current Doctrine Adequate?63,99 €![Is the Current US Navy Pacific Basing Structure Adequate for the Twenty-First Century?]( "Is the Current US Navy Pacific Basing Structure Adequate for the Twenty-First Century?")
Is the Current US Navy Pacific Basing Structure Adequate for the Twenty-First Century?63,99 €![US Armed Forces Information Operations: Is the Doctrine Adequate?]( "US Armed Forces Information Operations: Is the Doctrine Adequate?")
US Armed Forces Information Operations: Is the Doctrine Adequate?63,99 €![Current MOUT Doctrine Enhanced by Elements of Operational Design: An Imperative for Planning Future Military Operations in Urbanized Terrain]( "Current MOUT Doctrine Enhanced by Elements of Operational Design: An Imperative for Planning Future Military Operations in Urbanized Terrain")
Current MOUT Doctrine Enhanced by Elements of Operational Design: An Imperative for Planning Future Military Operations in Urbanized Terrain63,99 €![Counterinsurgency and Operational Art: Is the Joint Campaign Planning Model Adequate?]( "Counterinsurgency and Operational Art: Is the Joint Campaign Planning Model Adequate?")
Counterinsurgency and Operational Art: Is the Joint Campaign Planning Model Adequate?63,99 €![Current Mout Doctrine and Its Adequacy for Today's Army]( "Current Mout Doctrine and Its Adequacy for Today's Army")
Current Mout Doctrine and Its Adequacy for Today's Army64,99 €
The research revealed that current Army doctrine on operational reach is inadequate. One of the characteristics of sound doctrine found in TRADOC Regulation 25-36 is "Concise doctrine provides a comprehensive body of thought..." However, the analysis of joint doctrine, military theory, and history provides numerous concepts not included in the Army's current operational manual, FM 3-0. Furthermore, TRADOC Regulation 25-36 also states "Flexible doctrine gives soldiers, leaders, and organizations the leeway to adapt to many different, or changing, circumstances." This passage usually means doctrine should not be overly prescriptive, restricting initiative and innovation. However, to be flexible and adapt to many different, or changing, circumstances, Army planners must have a doctrine that provides more than just a short reference. While doctrine should not have to address every technique, the doctrine on operational reach is clearly lacking the needed breadth to make it adequate. The Army must change doctrine on operational reach. The study discovered that doctrine on operational reach must include the idea of a definitive limit to the decisive employment of military force in every operation. Exceeding this limit will either force an operational pause or lead to culmination. Additionally, the Army must include more concepts on extending operational reach than are currently considered. This will make the doctrine far more comprehensive and flexible.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.