Vor Ort
Merkzettel Warenkorb
  • Produktbild: Judicial Decision Making, Sentencing Policy, and Numerical Guidance
  • Produktbild: Judicial Decision Making, Sentencing Policy, and Numerical Guidance

Judicial Decision Making, Sentencing Policy, and Numerical Guidance

Aus der Reihe Research in Criminology

116,99 €

inkl. gesetzl. MwSt., Versandkostenfrei

Beschreibung

Produktdetails

Einband

Gebundene Ausgabe

Erscheinungsdatum

28.11.1988

Abbildungen

XII, 320 p.

Verlag

Springer Us

Seitenzahl

320

Maße (L/B/H)

2/15,9/24,2 cm

Gewicht

600 g

Auflage

1989

Sprache

Englisch

ISBN

978-0-387-96764-6

Beschreibung

Produktdetails

Einband

Gebundene Ausgabe

Erscheinungsdatum

28.11.1988

Abbildungen

XII, 320 p.

Verlag

Springer Us

Seitenzahl

320

Maße (L/B/H)

2/15,9/24,2 cm

Gewicht

600 g

Auflage

1989

Sprache

Englisch

ISBN

978-0-387-96764-6

Herstelleradresse

Libri GmbH
Europaallee 1
36244 Bad Hersfeld
DE

Email: gpsr@libri.de

Noch keine Bewertungen vorhanden

Verfassen Sie die erste Bewertung zu diesem Artikel

Helfen Sie anderen Kundinnen und Kunden durch Ihre Meinung.

Kundinnen und Kunden meinen

Bewertungen (0)
  • Produktbild: Judicial Decision Making, Sentencing Policy, and Numerical Guidance
  • Produktbild: Judicial Decision Making, Sentencing Policy, and Numerical Guidance
  • One A Perspective for a Quantitative Approach to Sentencing Policy and Guidance.- 1 The Task of Describing Sentencing Policy Quantitatively.- The Structure and Nature of the Sentencing Judgment.- Imprecision in the Sentencing Judgment.- Legal Perspectives on the Problem of Imprecision in the Sentencing Judgment.- The Study: Challenge and Constraints.- 2 Approaches to the Development of Detailed Sentencing Statistics and Numerical Guidelines.- Guideline Judgments of the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) in England.- Wilkins’s Empirically Based Descriptive Guidelines.- Hogarth’s Sentencing Data Base.- Doob’s Sentencing Data Base.- Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission’s Policy-Based Prescriptive Guidelines.- United States Sentencing Commission’s Presumptive Guidelines.- 3 Toward a Model of Judicial Decision Making: An Unproductive Review of Psychological Research.- Atheoretical Approaches to the Study of Sentencing.- Theoretical Approaches to the Study of Sentencing.- The Role of Theory in Sentencing.- Psychological Contributions to the Study of Sentencing: An Overview.- Two An Archival Study of a Legal Model of Judicial Decision Making in Sentencing.- 4 A Legal Model of Judicial Decision Making.- Scaling Culpability.- Primary and Secondary Decisions in the Sentencing Judgment.- The Construction of the Sentencing Statistics.- David Thomas: An Overdue Tribute.- 5 The Data Base and Data Collection.- The Principal Offense.- The Sample of Cases.- Sentences and Orders of the Court.- Data Sources.- Procedure.- The Cross Validation Study.- 6 Offense Characteristics of Burglary.- Violence to the Victims (Nonoffenders).- Organization.- Total Value of the Theft.- Counts of Burglary.- Comparison of the Frequency of the Use of the Categories Across Dimensions.- Supplementary Categories.- Cross-Validation Study.- 7 The Relationship Between Offense Characteristics of Burglary and Sentence.- Validity of the Assumptions Underlying the Use of Groups for Differentiating Offenses Across Premises Types and the Use of Dimensions to Differentiate Offenses Within Premises Types.- Cross Validation Study.- 8 Offender Characteristics and Prior Convictions in Cases of Burglary.- Use of Offender Categories.- Prior Convictions.- Comparison of the Frequency of the Use of the Categories Across the Dimensions of Prior Convictions.- Cross-Validation Study.- 9 The Relationship Between Offender Characteristics of Burglary and Sentence.- The Scoring and Weighting of Prior Convictions.- Offender Characteristics (Excluding Prior Convictions).- Total Mitigation Scores.- Relationship Between Total Mitigation Scores and Type of Premises.- Cross-Validation Study.- 10 The Relationship Between Case (Offense and Offender) Characteristics of Burglary and Sentence.- The Combination of Offense Seriousness and Total Mitigation.- Adjustment of the Case Scores.- Relationship Between Adjusted Case Scores for Burglary and Sentence.- The Sentencing Decision.- The Relationship Between the Type of Premises and the Length of the Effective Sentence.- Cross-Validation Study.- 11 Toward Detailed Sentencing Statistics.- Detailed Sentencing Statistics as an Operational System.- Detailed Sentencing Statistics: Problems and Prospects.- Three Sentencing Policy and Numerical Guidance as a Deliberative Process.- 12 Judicial Input Into the Model of Sentencing.- Decomposed Scaling Procedures.- Holistic Scaling Procedures.- Relative Merits of the Decomposed and Holistic Scaling Procedures.- Overview of the Analysis.- 13 The Validity of the Technique of Fictitious Cases.- The Validity Study.- 14 Multiattribute Utility Measurement and the Model of Judicial Decision Making.- Identification and Operational Definition of the Offense Characteristics Material to Seriousness.- Development of Scales of Relative Seriousness in Relation to Each Offense Factor.- Determination of the Relative Importance of Each Offense Factor in the Assessment of Seriousness.- Calculation of the Overall Seriousness of the Offense Characteristics.- Assessment of the Sensitivity of the Estimates of the Offense Factor Weights.- 15 Scaling of Seriousness and Assessment of Weights for Offense Factors of Burglary.- MAUM Method.- Text of Sentencing Research Exercise—Part 2.- Results and Discussion.- 16 Coherence and the Tariff.- Method.- Results and Discussion.- 17 Toward Deliberative Sentencing and Numerical Guidelines.- Fictitious Cases as a Basis for the Description of Current Sentencing Policy: Detailed Sentencing Statistics.- Fictitious Cases as a Basis for the Development and Reform of Sentencing Policy: Numerical Guidelines.- Overview and Conclusion.- Appendix 1 A Sample Case in Exercise 1.- New Case.- Appendix 2 A Sample Fictitious Case in Exercise 3 and Exercise 4.- New Case.- References.- Author Index.