Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Modelling of Spatial Variability of Seismic Ground Motions]( "Modelling of Spatial Variability of Seismic Ground Motions")
Modelling of Spatial Variability of Seismic Ground Motions36,99 €![Sub-Soil Exploration]( "Sub-Soil Exploration")
Sub-Soil Exploration26,99 €![Spatial prediction and mapping temperature]( "Spatial prediction and mapping temperature")
Spatial prediction and mapping temperature16,99 €![Potentially Toxic Element Contamination in Closed Urban Landfills]( "Potentially Toxic Element Contamination in Closed Urban Landfills")
Potentially Toxic Element Contamination in Closed Urban Landfills46,99 €![Improvement of Gypseous Soil Properties by Fly Ash]( "Improvement of Gypseous Soil Properties by Fly Ash")
Improvement of Gypseous Soil Properties by Fly Ash17,99 €![Climate variability and agricultural production in central Benin]( "Climate variability and agricultural production in central Benin")
Climate variability and agricultural production in central Benin26,99 €![Soil Mapping and Process Modeling for Sustainable Land Use Management]( "Soil Mapping and Process Modeling for Sustainable Land Use Management")
Soil Mapping and Process Modeling for Sustainable Land Use Management133,99 €
Thus, descriptive statistics indicated the size able spatial variability for all soil variables. Further understanding of the spatial structures of soil variables can be helpful for revealing their spatial distribution and achieving the reasonable site specific farming management. The geo-statistical analysis of soil variables suggested that the value nugget-sill ratio ranges from 0% (EC) to 55.22% (Av P), except for available sulfur(72.21%), indicating that internal factors were dominant over external factors. Soil EC and OM had the strong spatial dependence with a nugget-sill ratio of < 25%, because it induced by structural factors. But the spatial variability of other soil variables (pH, TN, Av P, Av K & Av S) had the moderate spatial dependence with a nugget-sill ratio of 25-75%, because the variables were mainly determined by internal and external factors.These results are reflection of many factors including soil pH, CEC, OC, amount of moisture held by soil particles, fertilizer application, animal manure application with different amendments, intensive cropping system, different land use pattern, topography of the field at different weather condition and texture percentage.