Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![New Learning Environments for Language Learning]( "New Learning Environments for Language Learning")
New Learning Environments for Language Learning63,35 €![Enseigner les langues-cultures à l¿ère de la complexité / Teaching Language and Culture in an Era of Complexity]( "Enseigner les langues-cultures à l¿ère de la complexité / Teaching Language and Culture in an Era of Complexity")
Enseigner les langues-cultures à l¿ère de la complexité / Teaching Language and Culture in an Era of Complexity70,40 €![Europa in Sagen und Märchen]( "Europa in Sagen und Märchen")
Europa in Sagen und Märchen67,55 €![Teaching and Learning in the Arab World]( "Teaching and Learning in the Arab World")
Teaching and Learning in the Arab World119,75 €![The Discursive Construction of Second Language Learners¿ Motivation]( "The Discursive Construction of Second Language Learners¿ Motivation")
The Discursive Construction of Second Language Learners¿ Motivation111,30 €![Extroversion/Introversion in Foreign Language Learning]( "Extroversion/Introversion in Foreign Language Learning")
Extroversion/Introversion in Foreign Language Learning68,95 €![Bilingualer Geschichtsunterricht im internationalen Fokus]( "Bilingualer Geschichtsunterricht im internationalen Fokus")
Bilingualer Geschichtsunterricht im internationalen Fokus81,70 €
The study investigates interactions between 29 tandem partners from a German and a North American university, who met twice a week in a text-based online environment that allowed them to communicate with each other in real time via a computer keyboard. The analysis focuses on learners' codeswitching, negotiation of meaning, error correction, and the use of specific spellings and punctuation.
The data suggest that most partners complied with the principle of reciprocity and that the non-threatening atmosphere of the MOO encouraged them to test their hypotheses about their L2. Moreover, the analysis revealed a noticeable increase in learners' awareness of the target language. All students frequently engaged in negotiation of meaning, but there was a conspicuous absence of corrective feedback.
The data suggest that most partners complied with the principle of reciprocity and that the non-threatening atmosphere of the MOO encouraged them to test their hypotheses about their L2. Moreover, the analysis revealed a noticeable increase in learners' awareness of the target language. All students frequently engaged in negotiation of meaning, but there was a conspicuous absence of corrective feedback.