Andere Kunden interessierten sich auch für
![Transforming Doctrine and Organization to Meet the Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Requirements of the Brigade Combat Team Commander]( "Transforming Doctrine and Organization to Meet the Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Requirements of the Brigade Combat Team Commander")
Transforming Doctrine and Organization to Meet the Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Requirements of the Brigade Combat Team Commander60,99 €![Multiple Mission Modularity: Optimizing the Brigade Combat Team for Combined Arms Maneuver and Wide Area Security Missions]( "Multiple Mission Modularity: Optimizing the Brigade Combat Team for Combined Arms Maneuver and Wide Area Security Missions")
Multiple Mission Modularity: Optimizing the Brigade Combat Team for Combined Arms Maneuver and Wide Area Security Missions63,99 €![Is the Stryker Brigade Combat Team a Viable Concept?]( "Is the Stryker Brigade Combat Team a Viable Concept?")
Is the Stryker Brigade Combat Team a Viable Concept?63,99 €![Costs and Benefits of Adding a Third Maneuver Battalion to the Brigade Combat Team]( "Costs and Benefits of Adding a Third Maneuver Battalion to the Brigade Combat Team")
Costs and Benefits of Adding a Third Maneuver Battalion to the Brigade Combat Team60,99 €![Army's Gambit: Dislocation Theory and the Development of Doctrine for the Interim Brigade Combat Team]( "Army's Gambit: Dislocation Theory and the Development of Doctrine for the Interim Brigade Combat Team")
Army's Gambit: Dislocation Theory and the Development of Doctrine for the Interim Brigade Combat Team63,99 €![Reconstruction and Stabilization Operations: Field Advanced Civilian Team and Army Brigade Combat Team Integration at the Tactical Level]( "Reconstruction and Stabilization Operations: Field Advanced Civilian Team and Army Brigade Combat Team Integration at the Tactical Level")
Reconstruction and Stabilization Operations: Field Advanced Civilian Team and Army Brigade Combat Team Integration at the Tactical Level60,99 €![Fixed-Wing Air Support Planning Models for the Brigade Combat Team]( "Fixed-Wing Air Support Planning Models for the Brigade Combat Team")
Fixed-Wing Air Support Planning Models for the Brigade Combat Team63,99 €
The 2006 Quadrennial Defense Review directs the Military Services to develop, within their general-purpose forces (GPF), the capability to conduct security force assistance, more specifically to train, advise, and assist foreign security forces. The Army wants to meet this requirement with the Modular Brigade Combat Team (BCT), while critics advocate a different approach, such as a permanent "advisor corps." This thesis seeks to answer the following primary research question: Is the Modular Brigade Combat Team the optimal solution for meeting future requirements to train, advise, assist and partner with foreign security forces? To answer this question, several secondary research questions were explored. These questions included, determining the capabilities and capacity required, the roles of both general-purpose forces (GPF) and special operations forces (SOF), and what kind of advisors and trainers are required. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of the advisor corps concept and the BCT were examined. Research and analysis determined that future capability and capacity requirements, as well as the delineation of mission sets between GPF and SOF remain difficult to quantify. Analysis also determined that training personnel to be advisors is a more practical method than selecting advisors. Evaluation of the advisor corps concept revealed that it is costly and does not provide improved capability. The answer to the primary research question is that the Modular BCT is the optimal solution, but only if the Army can change cultural norms that have the potential to impede effectiveness.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.
Hinweis: Dieser Artikel kann nur an eine deutsche Lieferadresse ausgeliefert werden.